Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Forum administrators, Interface administrators, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators
116,199
edits
Fallacy of Composition: Difference between revisions
"fanfic"->"fan works"
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) ("fanfic"->"fan works") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 8:
{{examples}}
== [[
* This trope can be a result of [[Author Appeal]]. For example: "''[[Harry Potter (novel)|Harry Potter]]'' is awesome. [[Goth]]s are awesome. Therefore [[My Immortal|a fanfic which combines them]] should be awesome."
Line 31:
* The classic trick question "which is heavier, a ton of feathers or a ton of lead?" works because of this fallacy; the hope is that the person answering will think that because ''individual'' feathers are light, a measured weight of them would be lighter than the same weight of something normally thought of as "heavy."
** Some trick questions go even further and make the feathers the right answer, by using different measures of weight.
** There's a mess of "tun" or "tonnage" measures... of volume, ie: [[wikipedia:tun (unit)|tun]], [[wikipedia:tonnage|tonnage]], [[wikipedia:shipping ton|shipping ton]]. Most pertain to ocean-going cargo ships. Feathers do pointlessly add a huge amount of volume, for any given constant weight. For that matter, the railway [[wikipedia:gross ton mile|gross ton mile]] is the product of total weight (including the weight of lading cars and locomotives) and the distance moved by a train. A ton of feathers, plus the container to hold them all, gets bulky quickly.
* Internet filters rely on this trope. Imagine why Pakistan blocked ''all'' of [[Facebook]] because of just one group.
** The same is true of word filters: written erotica may mention breasts, but blocking all uses of the word blocks out gynaecology, chicken recipes, breast cancer prevention/treatment and other innocent uses. The "[[Scunthorpe Problem]]" nets even more collateral blocking (while the devious perverts just use word-substitution tricks).
** There are also risks of extensive collateral damage if a system like [[Communism|communist]] [[China]]'s [[Great Firewall of China|Great Firewall]] blocks services by IP address. "Uncyclopedia is bad, [[Uncyclopedia|Uncyclopedia Taiwan]] hides behind Cloudflare, therefore Cloudflare and everything hosted through Cloudflare is bad..." is sadly par for the course in some nations.
* Any artistic endeavours which employ several superstars within their respective fields and hope the lightning strikes again can fall prey to this trope. For one example, the game ''[[Shadows of the Damned]]'' features the work of three famous Japanese developers. The result, while positively received, was not considered a gift from the gaming gods. Likewise, David Hayter, Dave Gibbons ([[Disowned Adaptation|not Alan Moore, though]]), and Zack Snyder put out the ''[[Watchmen (film)|Watchmen]]'' movie and received similarly lukewarm reviews.
* Alternative health claims are rife with these. The claimants will say that X is in a drug/food/compound, and therefore that the substance is healthful/unhealthful. For example, one fad claims that Splenda is toxic because it contains the element chlorine. It does. So does table salt. That's a classic example of this fallacy. A less unreasonable claim is that chloro-carbons (like Splenda) are unhealthful, while ionic chlorine (such as salt) is fine. This claim does not run afoul of this fallacy, though "Splenda is toxic at any reasonable dose" is not accepted by mainstream evidence-based medical practitioners. Food additives go through extensive toxicity testing before approval.
**[[Techno Babble|Dihydrogen monoxide]], on the other hand? [[Metaphorically True|Deadly stuff]]. Sadly, it will take [[Titanic|a disaster of titanic proportions]] with thousands killed before anyone acknowledges [[Weaksauce Weakness|the true danger]].
{{reflist}}
| |||