Fetish Fuel Future: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) →Web Original: fixed redlink |
|||
Line 4:
The difference between this and basic [[Author Appeal]] is the compulsion by some authors to justify their fetish. [[Quentin Tarantino]] having a lot of [[Foot Focus]] in his movies is [[Author Appeal]]. If he made a movie that explains how in the year 2525 ''everyone'' will be a foot fetishist due to some social or technological development, that would be a [[Fetish Fuel Future]].
Used a lot in written erotica. Also some porn movies but not as much as you'd think, given that typically porn movies are [[Porn Without Plot]] and thus don't even bother with a story to the sex.
Is sometimes used to "justify" the depiction of [[Romanticized Abuse|behavior and social structures]] that would otherwise push the characters over the [[Moral Event Horizon]]. (Although it can still make the world [[Crapsack World|crapsack]] or [[Crap Saccharine World|crapsaccharine]], and make some people suspect that the author actually [[Author Tract|advocates such values for real]].)
Line 90:
[[Category:Fetish Fuel Future]]
[[Category:No Real Life Examples, Please]]
[[Category:Alliterative Trope Titles]]
|