Fictional Colour: Difference between revisions

Line 52:

== New Media ==

* [http://www.negativland.com/squant/index.html Squant] on Negativland.com

* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120403133229/http://www.negativland.com/squant/index.html Squant] on Negativland.com

Line 88:

== Real Life ==

* As reported in [http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=seeing-forbidden-colors Scientific American] and [[wikipedia:Impossible colors|the other wiki]] citing [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1691544 Science], through various bits of optical illusion type gimmickery, people can see and recognize a Fictional Colour - two, in fact: the color that is a blend of blue and yellow that is not green, and the color that is a blend of green and red that is not ick brown.

* As reported in [https://web.archive.org/web/20131023150310/http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=seeing-forbidden-colors Scientific American] and [[wikipedia:Impossible colors|the other wiki]] citing [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1691544 Science], through various bits of optical illusion type gimmickery, people can see and recognize a Fictional Colour - two, in fact: the color that is a blend of blue and yellow that is not green, and the color that is a blend of green and red that is not ick brown.

** A similar sort of thing is magenta, which people only ''think'' they see to [[The Coconut Effect|fill in the blank on the colour wheel]] [[Reality Is Unrealistic|to which reality didn't bother conforming]].

* It is possible for many animals and even some humans to [http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/04/04/8255929/ see ultra-violet light]