Godwin's Law: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (Mass update links)
m (revise quote template spacing)
Line 2: Line 2:
[[File:hitlercard2.jpg|link=Magic: The Gathering|frame|There are some things stupid arguments can't solve. For everything else, there's [[The Hitler Card]]. <ref>[[Magic: The Gathering|You do need 6 untapped lands to cast it, though.]]</ref>]]
[[File:hitlercard2.jpg|link=Magic: The Gathering|frame|There are some things stupid arguments can't solve. For everything else, there's [[The Hitler Card]]. <ref>[[Magic: The Gathering|You do need 6 untapped lands to cast it, though.]]</ref>]]


{{quote| ''"You wanna know [[Hitler Ate Sugar|who else]] used laws to stop debates? [[Adolf Hitler|HITLER]]!"''}}
{{quote|''"You wanna know [[Hitler Ate Sugar|who else]] used laws to stop debates? [[Adolf Hitler|HITLER]]!"''}}


Also known as "Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies". Originated by Richard Sexton, and popularized by Mike Godwin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and of [[The Other Wiki|the Wikimedia Foundation]] until 2010) in 1990 in the form:
Also known as "Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies". Originated by Richard Sexton, and popularized by Mike Godwin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and of [[The Other Wiki|the Wikimedia Foundation]] until 2010) in 1990 in the form:


{{quote| As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving [[Those Wacky Nazis|Nazis]] or [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] approaches one.}}
{{quote|As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving [[Those Wacky Nazis|Nazis]] or [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] approaches one.}}


Reformulated in the [http://www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/net-legends-faq/part2.html Net.Legends FAQ]s "Usenet Rule #4":
Reformulated in the [http://www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/net-legends-faq/part2.html Net.Legends FAQ]s "Usenet Rule #4":


{{quote| "Any off-topic mention of Hitler or Nazis will cause the thread it is mentioned in to come to an irrelevant and off-topic end very soon; every thread on [[UseNet]] has a constantly-increasing probability to contain such a mention."}}
{{quote|"Any off-topic mention of Hitler or Nazis will cause the thread it is mentioned in to come to an irrelevant and off-topic end very soon; every thread on [[UseNet]] has a constantly-increasing probability to contain such a mention."}}


It is generally accepted that [[Derailing|whoever is the first to play the "Hitler card"]] has lost the argument as well as any trace of respect, as having to resort to comparing your adversary to the most infamous mass-murdering dictator in history generally means you've run out of ''better'' arguments. Thus, once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law.
It is generally accepted that [[Derailing|whoever is the first to play the "Hitler card"]] has lost the argument as well as any trace of respect, as having to resort to comparing your adversary to the most infamous mass-murdering dictator in history generally means you've run out of ''better'' arguments. Thus, once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law.