Godwin's Law: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Mass update links) |
m (revise quote template spacing) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:hitlercard2.jpg|link=Magic: The Gathering|frame|There are some things stupid arguments can't solve. For everything else, there's [[The Hitler Card]]. <ref>[[Magic: The Gathering|You do need 6 untapped lands to cast it, though.]]</ref>]] |
[[File:hitlercard2.jpg|link=Magic: The Gathering|frame|There are some things stupid arguments can't solve. For everything else, there's [[The Hitler Card]]. <ref>[[Magic: The Gathering|You do need 6 untapped lands to cast it, though.]]</ref>]] |
||
{{quote| |
{{quote|''"You wanna know [[Hitler Ate Sugar|who else]] used laws to stop debates? [[Adolf Hitler|HITLER]]!"''}} |
||
Also known as "Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies". Originated by Richard Sexton, and popularized by Mike Godwin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and of [[The Other Wiki|the Wikimedia Foundation]] until 2010) in 1990 in the form: |
Also known as "Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies". Originated by Richard Sexton, and popularized by Mike Godwin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (and of [[The Other Wiki|the Wikimedia Foundation]] until 2010) in 1990 in the form: |
||
{{quote| |
{{quote|As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving [[Those Wacky Nazis|Nazis]] or [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] approaches one.}} |
||
Reformulated in the [http://www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/net-legends-faq/part2.html Net.Legends FAQ]s "Usenet Rule #4": |
Reformulated in the [http://www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/na-dir/net-legends-faq/part2.html Net.Legends FAQ]s "Usenet Rule #4": |
||
{{quote| |
{{quote|"Any off-topic mention of Hitler or Nazis will cause the thread it is mentioned in to come to an irrelevant and off-topic end very soon; every thread on [[UseNet]] has a constantly-increasing probability to contain such a mention."}} |
||
It is generally accepted that [[Derailing|whoever is the first to play the "Hitler card"]] has lost the argument as well as any trace of respect, as having to resort to comparing your adversary to the most infamous mass-murdering dictator in history generally means you've run out of ''better'' arguments. Thus, once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law. |
It is generally accepted that [[Derailing|whoever is the first to play the "Hitler card"]] has lost the argument as well as any trace of respect, as having to resort to comparing your adversary to the most infamous mass-murdering dictator in history generally means you've run out of ''better'' arguments. Thus, once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress. This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin's law. |