Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators
214,865
edits
Hollywood Economics: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (Mass update links) |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{trope}}{{page should be category}}
In media, certain human activities are not portrayed in a manner one might think of as realistic, even in an otherwise realistic setting. While [[You Fail Economics Forever|national or global economics]] may be portrayed unrealistically out of a case of [[Did Not Do the Research]], on a more personal level, economics are often portrayed unrealistically for other reasons.
Perhaps due to the [[Rule of Cool]] or the [[Rule of Funny]], certain aspects of main characters may be portrayed unrealistically. They may be identified with a [[Limited Wardrobe|particular item of clothing]], [[Bunny Ears Lawyer|odd habits]], [[Big Eater|needing to eat more to live than an average person could consume safely]], etc. Some characters become [[Wish Fulfillment]], and are given abilities or advantages which the fandom would enjoy possessing themselves. The [[Rule of Drama]] typically requires that a character be sympathetic and find themselves in undesirable circumstances. This acts to help prevent characters from becoming [[The Scrappy|annoyingly]] [[The War On Straw|one dimensional]] or [[Mary Sue|unexciting]]. One way to do that without threatening the character directly is to create a financial difficulty or cause trouble with possessions, supplies, or food that one might trade for money, and the more painful,
Life for both protagonists and villains can be harsh and cruel, but there is an insurance policy for recurring characters: [[Status Quo Is God]]. No matter how completely a humorous event devastates a character's finances or health, this, along with creative license, allows the author to restore them to their old circumstances. But [[Status Quo Is God]] cuts both ways. A character who is normally not wealthy can win history's largest lottery prize, but if so, they are likely to lose it within the next few episodes if not sooner. And just because a character can afford the loss of their home every other month and their clothes every other day does not mean they can afford a lifestyle where this happens less often.
Not to be confused with [[
'''In fiction, financial difficulties are caused by the plot, character development, and one's enemies, not the characters' own actions.'''
Line 21:
A character never seems to have financial or logistics troubles unless their adversaries cause it, or when absolutely required by the plot.
* [[No Delays for
* [[Infinite Supplies]]
* [[Offscreen Villain Dark Matter]].
Line 28:
A character seems to have funding to allow them to spend unlimited quantities of money in one or all areas of their life without any lasting consequences. May be [[Lampshaded]] or [[Justified]] if others begin to suspect something suspicious is going on. In extreme cases, a character seems to have wealth beyond what one might expect to be physically possible within a given economy, consuming vast fortunes in every episode without any apparent significant impact to their bottom line:
* [[
* [[Friends Rent Control]]
* [[Improbable Food Budget]]
| |||