Mugging the Monster: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 623:
* Some young men were routinely killing dogs on their neighborhood and killed one small Labrador. The owner came home, pursued them in his car with a gun, then held them at gun point until the Texas Rangers appeared and arrested them. The men threatened the man who had held them at gunpoint, saying he did not know who he was messing with. The man then had the Texas Rangers reveal to the men who had killed his dog that he was [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30136615/ Marcus Luttrell], an ex-Navy SEAL, who had won a firefight against roughly 80 Taliban fighters and was the only survivor of the battle, after dispatching every enemy fighter.
* Two "tough guys" [http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/1274688/Chuck/ tried to rob] [[Chuck Norris]] with knives, under the assumption that what he did in ''[[Walker, Texas Ranger]]'' [[Reality Is Unrealistic|was all fake]]. The two ended up with arms so broken that bones were sticking out. The police didn't even handcuff them, partly out of concern for the thugs' injuries, and partly because they were laughing too hard.
** Well, the stuff on ''[[Walker, Texas Ranger]]'' '''is''' all fake. It's some of the worst stuntwork Norris has ever done. Which is probably why the younger generation has forgotten that back in his prime, Chuck had won the World Middleweight Karate Championship tournament ''six times in a row''. Seriously, short of going back in time to pick a fight with Bruce Lee it's hard to top being stupid enough to throw a punch at Chuck Norris.
* [http://superstore.wnd.com/Shooting-Back-The-Right-and-Duty-of-Self-Defense-book Shooting Back] recounts an incident where some Islamic terrorists tried to shoot up a church, presumably expecting that they'd be able to slaughter people without resistance. Much to their surprise, Charl van Wyck returns fire, thwarting their attack.
* An example out of Ferdinand von Schirach's ''Verbrechen'' (a book of cases he precided over as a lawyer). Some skinheads decide that a wimpy looking man in a neat suit would be a nice diversion. They ended up dead. It was hinted later, that the guy in the suit was a contract killer on his way home. He had no papers on him, no mark that could identify him - he didn't speak a single word. They had to let him go because they had no evidence and the thing they had on him was clearly self-defense - there were several witnesses to clear him.