8,347
edits
Nuclear Weapons Taboo/Quotes: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (Mass update links) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4:
{{quote|The best defence against the atom bomb is not to be there when it goes off.|'''The British Army Journal'''}}
{{quote|When two tribes go to war
A point is all that you can score|'''[[Frankie Goes to Hollywood]]''', "Two Tribes", 1985}}
{{quote|The World War II of military SF differs from the real one in one basic respect: It almost always seems to end on August 5, 1945. Even when SF geeks talk about weapons of annihilation, the favored techs are oddly roundabout - for example, the ever-popular [[Colony Drop|changing of an asteroid's orbit so it smashes into a planet with dinosaur-killer force]]. Come on, guys 'n' gals, no need to get that complicated. If you want to slag a planet, just nuke the hell out of it. It isn't like people who know how to build starships are going to forget how to build nukes.
In typical SF settings, where interplanetary/interstellar travel takes weeks or months, the thirty-minutes-till-Doomsday element of the [[Cold War]] may be absent, but [[Mutually Assured Destruction|the prospect of credible nuclear defense remains nearly as illusory]]. Yes, your defending space fleet can engage the attackers far off in space, but it won't be like a spacegoing Midway or Salamis, because the attacker can lose 99 percent of their strike force and still annihilate your homeworld with the remaining one percent.
|''Rocketpunk Manifesto'' [http://www.rocketpunk-manifesto.com/2007/08/i-am-become-death-destroyer-of-worlds.html on conspicuous absence] of [[Nuclear Option]] in SF. }}
{{reflist}}
| |||