Pokémon/Headscratchers/Archive Late 2010: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (Mass update links)
m (Convert TVT links to internal links)
Line 170: Line 170:
*** Wouldn't they realize this obvious mistake on the test stage? I mean, it's not like they just program the game and send it to the stores, there's tons of tests to do, ''someone'' would have noticed that.
*** Wouldn't they realize this obvious mistake on the test stage? I mean, it's not like they just program the game and send it to the stores, there's tons of tests to do, ''someone'' would have noticed that.
**** Because when you're constantly finding obvious mistakes, obvious starts to become a bit relative. Sometimes you need a fresh set of eyes to relaize the obvious mistake because you know something is supposed to happen that way and dismiss it, and then the guy you're impressing by testing the game points out that, yes, making the pokemon very weak makes it easier to catch like it's supposed to, but shouldn't knocking it out completely make it ''extremely'' easy to catch? Shouldn't the game just say no when you use a rare candy on a level 100 pokemon? And then you start searching for the minor bugs, so the fact '''j''' finally works overshadows the fact '''x''' is now half broken. Because after the 256th time playing through this part, you know you can do '''y''' to get to '''j''' faster or '''z''' to skip it entirely. And this is unrelated to Pokemon, but imagine the sorrow of a programmer with no tester. That 256 estimate listed above? More like 1024. Programmers in general are screwed, really (but, even as a programmer I must admit I feel sorry for the Pokemon graphics designers. Imagine how much they'll have to do in the 6th generation with 700 something pokemon in 3D, but probably still with all the darn 2d sprites, too).
**** Because when you're constantly finding obvious mistakes, obvious starts to become a bit relative. Sometimes you need a fresh set of eyes to relaize the obvious mistake because you know something is supposed to happen that way and dismiss it, and then the guy you're impressing by testing the game points out that, yes, making the pokemon very weak makes it easier to catch like it's supposed to, but shouldn't knocking it out completely make it ''extremely'' easy to catch? Shouldn't the game just say no when you use a rare candy on a level 100 pokemon? And then you start searching for the minor bugs, so the fact '''j''' finally works overshadows the fact '''x''' is now half broken. Because after the 256th time playing through this part, you know you can do '''y''' to get to '''j''' faster or '''z''' to skip it entirely. And this is unrelated to Pokemon, but imagine the sorrow of a programmer with no tester. That 256 estimate listed above? More like 1024. Programmers in general are screwed, really (but, even as a programmer I must admit I feel sorry for the Pokemon graphics designers. Imagine how much they'll have to do in the 6th generation with 700 something pokemon in 3D, but probably still with all the darn 2d sprites, too).
*** Their Japanese names are derived from "butterfly" (Butterfree, which is its name in both languages) and "moth" ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/morpho_butterfly Morphon]), and it's clear from the wing shape that Butterfree's sprite is supposed to be a butterfly and Venomoth's is supposed to be a moth's. Also, can you and everyone else quit [[Mis Blamed|saying "Nintendo"]] whenever you're talking about the people who design the games? You're not helping your case that the developers made a mistake when you can even remember who the actual developers are.
*** Their Japanese names are derived from "butterfly" (Butterfree, which is its name in both languages) and "moth" ([[wikipedia:morpho butterfly|Morphon]]), and it's clear from the wing shape that Butterfree's sprite is supposed to be a butterfly and Venomoth's is supposed to be a moth's. Also, can you and everyone else quit [[Mis Blamed|saying "Nintendo"]] whenever you're talking about the people who design the games? You're not helping your case that the developers made a mistake when you can even remember who the actual developers are.
**** I'd say the name of the company has very little bearing on whether or not you're inclined to make mistakes. We also are explicitly talking about the sprites here, so the names have no bearing either.
**** I'd say the name of the company has very little bearing on whether or not you're inclined to make mistakes. We also are explicitly talking about the sprites here, so the names have no bearing either.
**** Does that even matter? The point in case is: Venonat looks like it'd evolve into Butterfree, whoever the designers are(Gamefreak, I suppose?), that's the point. How does a gnat turn into a moth, anyway?
**** Does that even matter? The point in case is: Venonat looks like it'd evolve into Butterfree, whoever the designers are(Gamefreak, I suppose?), that's the point. How does a gnat turn into a moth, anyway?
Line 212: Line 212:
** In the original games and manga, they're shrunk. In the anime and later games, they're turned into pure energy and stored away. As for the second question, according to the anime, at least, wild Pokemon that attack trainers actually ''want'' to be caught, but only by strong trainers, and they battle to see if they're worthy of training them.
** In the original games and manga, they're shrunk. In the anime and later games, they're turned into pure energy and stored away. As for the second question, according to the anime, at least, wild Pokemon that attack trainers actually ''want'' to be caught, but only by strong trainers, and they battle to see if they're worthy of training them.
*** Of course, a few of Ash's have skipped the battle part and gone staight to joining his team. Perhaps his previous actions in the same episode count as proof enough...
*** Of course, a few of Ash's have skipped the battle part and gone staight to joining his team. Perhaps his previous actions in the same episode count as proof enough...
**** The truth is that Pokemon is a thinly-veiled metaphor for BDSM relationships. In theory, the dominant ("Pokemon Trainer") is the one in control of everything. But upon observation, the submissive ("trained Pokemon") is the one with all the actual power. Oh, wait, this isn't the [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/WMG/Pokemon Wild Mass Guessing] page...
**** The truth is that Pokemon is a thinly-veiled metaphor for BDSM relationships. In theory, the dominant ("Pokemon Trainer") is the one in control of everything. But upon observation, the submissive ("trained Pokemon") is the one with all the actual power. Oh, wait, this isn't the [[Pokémon (Franchise)/WMG|Wild Mass Guessing]] page...
***** Wait, I thought they turned into data, and that's how they're stored on PC? Which also explains why Porygon can manifest in the real world - it's just the same process backwards.
***** Wait, I thought they turned into data, and that's how they're stored on PC? Which also explains why Porygon can manifest in the real world - it's just the same process backwards.
** In the manga, at least, badges ''literally'' brainwash pokemon (love and affection just make it [[More Than Mind Control]]).
** In the manga, at least, badges ''literally'' brainwash pokemon (love and affection just make it [[More Than Mind Control]]).
Line 223: Line 223:
***** Time for a little history lesson! Why do the dragon trainers have Horseas, Seadra, and Kingdra? Why is Kingdra a dragon type? Well those of you who know the story of ''[[Fruits Basket]]'' (Why does the dragon turn into a ''sea horse'' when he's hugged?!) can probably answer that. If not, lemme explain - The Japanese saw the Sea Horse as a baby dragon.
***** Time for a little history lesson! Why do the dragon trainers have Horseas, Seadra, and Kingdra? Why is Kingdra a dragon type? Well those of you who know the story of ''[[Fruits Basket]]'' (Why does the dragon turn into a ''sea horse'' when he's hugged?!) can probably answer that. If not, lemme explain - The Japanese saw the Sea Horse as a baby dragon.
**** Antlions, AKA "Sand Dragons."
**** Antlions, AKA "Sand Dragons."
**** ''Dialga's a Dragon-type and it's a fricking giant metal horse.?'' [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphicoelias Oh, you make me laugh so.]
**** ''Dialga's a Dragon-type and it's a fricking giant metal horse.?'' [[wikipedia:Amphicoelias|Oh, you make me laugh so.]]
***** Dialga a horse? It's based on a sauropod.
***** Dialga a horse? It's based on a sauropod.
**** To be fair, The Other Wiki says that birds are descended from dinosaurs, so it makes a sort of sense to have Altaria be a Dragon-type...
**** To be fair, The Other Wiki says that birds are descended from dinosaurs, so it makes a sort of sense to have Altaria be a Dragon-type...
Line 745: Line 745:
** It must be something like that "this is your brain on drugs" ad...
** It must be something like that "this is your brain on drugs" ad...
** [[Narm|The same thing]] [[X Men (Film)|that happens to everything else]]. Bugs, while not resistant to psychic attacks, can hurt psychics enough to be a partial counterbalance to a poison weakness. Now, get a Poison/Fighting Pokémon like Croagunk involved...
** [[Narm|The same thing]] [[X Men (Film)|that happens to everything else]]. Bugs, while not resistant to psychic attacks, can hurt psychics enough to be a partial counterbalance to a poison weakness. Now, get a Poison/Fighting Pokémon like Croagunk involved...
* How the hell is Altaria supposed to be a Dragon-type? It doesn't have any draconic properties at all! Is there some sort of obscure myth that I'm missing? Bulbapedia says something about the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epsilon_Draconis star] its Japanese is based off being in the constellation Draco, but name alone doesn't seem good enough to justify it.
* How the hell is Altaria supposed to be a Dragon-type? It doesn't have any draconic properties at all! Is there some sort of obscure myth that I'm missing? Bulbapedia says something about the [[wikipedia:Epsilon Draconis|star]] its Japanese is based off being in the constellation Draco, but name alone doesn't seem good enough to justify it.
** They were probably in need of more Dragons in Gen-III, and it was the closest thing to a dragon in the list. Really, it's already been brought up somewhere above...
** They were probably in need of more Dragons in Gen-III, and it was the closest thing to a dragon in the list. Really, it's already been brought up somewhere above...
* The Pokémon archipelago seems to be too small for the amount of life it has. Specially considering even the insects are at least the size of a human's foot...
* The Pokémon archipelago seems to be too small for the amount of life it has. Specially considering even the insects are at least the size of a human's foot...
Line 882: Line 882:
** Arceus created Mew, and then that led to the evolution of all current Pokemon species.
** Arceus created Mew, and then that led to the evolution of all current Pokemon species.
*** So...who created ''Arceus''??
*** So...who created ''Arceus''??
**** You're a very clever troper... but it's [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down Arceus all the way down].
**** You're a very clever troper... but it's [[wikipedia:Turtles all the way down|Arceus all the way down]].
**** Don't pursue that line of thinking, it just leads to insomnia.
**** Don't pursue that line of thinking, it just leads to insomnia.
***** The way I see it, Arceus first created Dialga, Palkia, and Giratina, and created the universe through them. Then he created the Lake Guardians, then Mew. Mew then gave birth to Groudon, Kyogre, and Rayquaza, who created Earth. Possibly, Mew created such trios for other planets as well. Here's holding out for a trio for all 7 other planets. And Pluto. And, what the hell, lets throw Ceres in there, too.
***** The way I see it, Arceus first created Dialga, Palkia, and Giratina, and created the universe through them. Then he created the Lake Guardians, then Mew. Mew then gave birth to Groudon, Kyogre, and Rayquaza, who created Earth. Possibly, Mew created such trios for other planets as well. Here's holding out for a trio for all 7 other planets. And Pluto. And, what the hell, lets throw Ceres in there, too.
Line 1,284: Line 1,284:
** Things are damn fast, and Bellsprout's pretty slow.
** Things are damn fast, and Bellsprout's pretty slow.
** Touch a hot stovetop. See how quickly your brain tells you to get your hand off the stove. Teleportation is a psychic ability. As such, as soon as its brain gives the command, it teleports.
** Touch a hot stovetop. See how quickly your brain tells you to get your hand off the stove. Teleportation is a psychic ability. As such, as soon as its brain gives the command, it teleports.
** Irrelevant correction: your brain tells you no such thing. Reflexive actions in humans route directly from sensory input to motor reaction via the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflex_arc spinal column] precisely because it takes too long to route all the way to the brain, wait for it to process, then perform the reflex.
** Irrelevant correction: your brain tells you no such thing. Reflexive actions in humans route directly from sensory input to motor reaction via the [[wikipedia:Reflex arc|spinal column]] precisely because it takes too long to route all the way to the brain, wait for it to process, then perform the reflex.
* How can Hypnosis possibly miss?
* How can Hypnosis possibly miss?
** The targeted Pokemon looks away?
** The targeted Pokemon looks away?