Star Trek: The Next Generation/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions

Line 815:
*** As Tasha discovered.
** Pulaski, is that you?
** Information theory estimates that it would take approximately 10^90 years to brute-force all the possible combinations and permutations in chess using modern computing technology. Even assuming that Data's brain is a ''quadrillion'' times more powerful a computer than the 21st century's best (and while he's obviously ahead of current computers by many orders of magnitude, putting him a full 15 orders ahead of contemporary is still a generous estimate), that still leaves us with one thousand trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion (10^75) years' worth of number-crunching to completely solve chess. As a comparision, the estimated remaining lifespan of the universe is somewhere around 30 billion years. ShortEven version:granted Data might bethat a science-fictionsuitably supercomputer,sophisticated butalgorithm beingcan 100%significantly unbeatableprune inthis chessproblem isby apreliminary jobdiscarding thatof evena sci-fimajority supercomputers don't haveof the sizepossible for,game unlessstates youas bringsub-optimal in(i.e., somethingthere ridiculousare likea Deeplot Thoughtmore fromdumb the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Troi's win is still ''extremely unlikely'',moves in that she's taking on somebodychess withthan atthere leastare grandmastersmart skillmoves in chess), while she herselfwhich is nothow amodern-day rankedchess-playing playerprograms that anyone knows ofwork, but itsthat's still mathematicallynot a ''possibleperfect'' solution.
*** Short version: Data might be a science-fiction supercomputer, but being 100% unbeatable in chess is a job that even sci-fi supercomputers don't have the size for, unless you bring in something ridiculous like Deep Thought from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Troi's win is still ''extremely unlikely'', in that she's taking on somebody with at least grandmaster skill in chess while she herself is not a ranked player that anyone knows of, but its still mathematically ''possible''.
*** It was also likely intended as a callback to Kirk beating Spock in chess despite Spock's far superior logic, memory, and computational ability, because Kirk had intuition. The problem is Kirk was famed for his own brilliance (and luck), and Spock was not actually an android, so it's not as much of a stretch there as here.
**** In conclusion: its still one hell of a long shot, but at least its not violating the laws of thermodynamics or anything.