Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators
214,764
edits
Template:Logical Fallacies: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 31:
* [[Existential fallacy]]
* [[Modal scope fallacy]]
* [[Four Terms Fallacy|Fallacy of four terms]]
* [[Illicit major]]
* [[Illicit minor]]
* [[Negative conclusion from affirmative premises]]
* [[Undistributed Middle|Fallacy of the undistributed middle]]
}}
Line 46:
* [[Equivocation]]
* [[False equivalence]]
* [[:Category:False attribution|False attribution]]
* [[Quote Mine|Quoting out of context]]
* [[Loki's Wager]]
* [[No True Scotsman|No true Scotsman]]
* [[
| group2 = Question-begging
| list2 =
* [[Circular Reasoning|Circular reasoning]] / [[Begging the Question|Begging the question]]
* [[Loaded Words|Loaded language]]
** [[Leading question]]
* [[Double-barreled question|Compound question]] / [[Loaded question]] / [[Complex question]]
* [[No True Scotsman|No true Scotsman]]
| group3 = Correlative-based
Line 75:
| group5 = ''Secundum quid''
| list5 =
* [[
* [[Converse accident]]
Line 90:
* [[Overwhelming exception]]
| group7 =
| list7 =
* [[Fallacy of accent]]
* [[False precision]]
* [[Moving the Goalposts|Moving the goalposts]]
* [[Quote Mine|Quoting out of context]]
* [[Slippery Slope Fallacy|Slippery slope]]
* [[Sorites paradox]]
* [[Syntactic ambiguity]]
Line 111:
* [[Regression fallacy]]
* [[Fallacy of the single cause]]
* [[Slippery Slope Fallacy|Slippery slope]]
* [[Sharpshooter Fallacy|Texas sharpshooter fallacy]]
| group9 = Appeal to emotion
Line 131:
* [[Wisdom of repugnance]]
| group10 = [[Genetic Fallacy|Genetic fallacy]]
| list10 =
Line 137:
| group1 = ''[[Ad Hominem|Ad hominem]]''
| list1 =
* [[Appeal to motive]]<!-- -->
* [[Association Fallacy|Association fallacy]]
** ''[[Hitler Ate Sugar|Reductio ad Hitlerum]]''
*** [[Godwin's Law|Godwin's law]]
** ''[[Red-baiting]]''<!-- -->
* [[Bulverism]]<!-- Circular Reasoning meets Genetic Fallacy -->
* [[Poisoning the well]]<!-- preemptive smearing of one's opponent -->
* [[Tone policing]]<!-- criticizing one's opponent for expressing emotion -->
* ''[[Tu quoque]]''
* [[Whataboutism]]<!-- answering a question with a different question -->
| list2 =
* [[Appeal to Authority|Argument from authority]]
** [[Appeal to accomplishment]]<!-- stating one's opponent has not accomplished what one has accomplished -->
** ''[[Ipse dixit]]''<!-- "because I said so" -->
** [[Argumentum ad lazarum]] (Poverty) / [[Appeal to Wealth|Argumentum ad crumenam]]<!-- "I'm right because I'm poor / rich" -->
* [[Etymological fallacy]]<!-- arguing about the meaning of a word used in one's opponent's argument -->
* [[Appeal to nature]]<!-- claiming "natural" things are good _because_ they're "natural" -->
* [[Appeal to Tradition|Appeal to tradition]] / [[Appeal to Novelty|Appeal to novelty]]
** [[Chronological snobbery]]<!-- "newer is better" -->
}}
| group11 = [[Appeal to Consequences|Appeal to consequences]]
| list11 =
* ''[[Appeal to Force|Argumentum ad baculum]]''
* [[Wishful thinking]]
| group12 = Other fallacies of relevance
| list12 =
* ''[[Argumentum Ad Nauseam|Ad nauseam]]''
** [[Sealioning]]
* [[Argument to moderation]]
* ''[[Argumentum ad populum]]''
* [[Argumentum Ad Lapidem|Appeal to the stone]] / [[Proof by assertion]]
* ''[[Irrelevant conclusion]]''
* [[Appeal to the law]]
* [[Anecdotal Fallacy|Argument from anecdote]]
* [[Argument from silence]]
* [[Invincible ignorance fallacy]]<!-- person refuses to listen; not what we call "Appeal to Ignorance" -->
* [[Moralistic fallacy]] / [[Naturalistic fallacy]]
* [[Motte-and-bailey fallacy]]
* [[Rationalization]]
* [[Red Herring|Red herring]]
** [[Two wrongs make a right]]
* [[Special pleading]]
* [[Strawman Fallacy|Straw man]]
* [[Cliché]]
* [[I'm entitled to my opinion]]<!-- person says he has a right to his opinion, a.k.a. "let's agree to disagree" -->
}}
| |||