The Angry Joe Show/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(clean up)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14:
** I always just saw it as Joe making a fun format for his show while pledging to keep corporate politics from letting his honest opinion be heard.
* What happaned to the [[Superhero]] gimmick Joe used to have (ie.his secret identitity as mild mannered Joe) I've seen a few of his early videos and wondered where it went?
** Maybe he dropped it, because [[Atop the Fourth Wall (Web Video)|Linkara has a similar gimmick]].
* What's the deal with the text on the background screen? Sometimes it simply repeats or sums up what he's talking about, but other times it responds and refers to Joe in third person like it's some kind of AI buddy or similar.
* Why did it take him more than two months to review ''Green Lantern: Rise of The Manhunters''? Joe's whole schtick is that he reviews the recent releases, but I don't think anyone will argue that a two month old game that ties into a film no longer in cinemas doesn't exactly qualify as a recent release.
* Why is he the flagship reviewer for ''Blistered Thumbs'', when he only has an Xbox 360 & a PC and thus can't review any of the exclusive releases on the [[PSPlay Station 3]] & Wii?
* Ultimate Marvel Vs Capcom 3 - A lot of people has seen this infamous vid by now, but he's recently done an interview by Seth Killian. Rather than being a professional and asking questions and listening to his answers, he flat out disrespects the guy, not letting him finish his sentences or not even looking at him in the eye, coming off across as condescending and rude with his tone of voice and body language. Even moreso, he's still talking about a game that he told his own audience not to buy weeks ago and yet here he is still talking about it, and being immature about it, no less
** He also still manages to get some of his questions wrong.
Line 23:
*** Even more so with his recent Top Ten Games of 2011 list. He's still nitpicking on ''Vanilla'' Marvel vs. Capcom 3's lack of features despite the ''Ultimate'' update already being out and giving us a very beefy Heroes and Heralds mode.
*** And now he's put Vanilla Marvel vs. Capcom 3 on his Worst Games of 2011 list. Despite the fact that he gave the game an average review for lack of content, but still said that the actual fighting engine is great. Not to mention the fact that he made several scripted videos revolving around him playing it. I guess the realease of Ulitmate Marvel vs Capcom 3 really hit him harder than it should have.
*** In his defense, Joe has stated in his [[Mortal Kombat 9 (Video Game)|Mortal Kombat]] review that he views it (Mortal Kombat) as the new standard for fighting games here on out. Perhaps he was comparing (U)MvC3 to that.
**** Not that it helped since he constantly hammered at [[MVC 3]] in that review every 5-7 seconds or so.
** [[Wild Mass Guessing|Perhaps he's one of the many people bitter about Legends 3's cancellation.]]
** Wasn't that the incident when he went on in character without realizing it was a serious thing and ended up looking like a dick? I'm sure he's already appologized for that and realized his mistake. As for the game being on his Worst Game '11 list, Meh, its just his opinion. I actually love that game, but I've basically lost interest in holding other people's opinions against them.
*** Nope, Joe never apologised for his behaviour.
* If Corporate Commander is supposed to represent [[Executive Meddling]] and [[Money, Dear Boy]], then what is the [[Inspector Gadget|Doctor Claw]][[Expy|-esque Overlord]] supposed to be?
 
{{worksubpagefooter}}
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Web Original/Headscratchers]]
[[Category:The Angry Joe Show]]
[[Category:Headscratchers]]
__NOTOC__
{{DEFAULTSORT:Angry Joe Show, The}}