Topic on User talk:DocColress

Line 2: Line 2:


For example, say we were to make a subpage for every single game in the ''Final Fantasy'' series that has an example. In some of those games, there is only one character who matches the criteria needed to qualify as a Complete Monster. But now that the single games have their own pages, what's to stop someone from either adding new elaboration on the character so that the page becomes nothing but rambling about how evil that character is, or possibly adding a character who doesn't qualify? It opens a can of worm that I'd prefer we not open.
For example, say we were to make a subpage for every single game in the ''Final Fantasy'' series that has an example. In some of those games, there is only one character who matches the criteria needed to qualify as a Complete Monster. But now that the single games have their own pages, what's to stop someone from either adding new elaboration on the character so that the page becomes nothing but rambling about how evil that character is, or possibly adding a character who doesn't qualify? It opens a can of worm that I'd prefer we not open.

There should be a limit to how liberally we use tropes and how far we take "We Are Not TV Tropes". This right here is a line that needn't be crossed.


''Series examples would be better served on a communal page for CMs that span multiple works in a series, since they can't be pigeonholed to just one specific work.''
''Series examples would be better served on a communal page for CMs that span multiple works in a series, since they can't be pigeonholed to just one specific work.''