Topic on Talk:Donald Trump

Line 3: Line 3:
I'm not sure the precedent applies as the situation is different. The Cakeshop was claiming freedom of speech and religion to not cater for a gay wedding as it went against the religious beliefs of the shop's owner... while this situation is social media platforms banning a head of state because they don't agree with his politics and accuse him of deliberately inciting a riot (there's also some double standards/selective enforcement of rules at work if this is compared to how these platforms treated the politicians and celebrities who endorsed violence from the other side of the political spectrum; such as the George Floyd Riots- even the George Floyd Protests violated COVID-19 social distancing regulations - and the CHAZ Insurrection).
I'm not sure the precedent applies as the situation is different. The Cakeshop was claiming freedom of speech and religion to not cater for a gay wedding as it went against the religious beliefs of the shop's owner... while this situation is social media platforms banning a head of state because they don't agree with his politics and accuse him of deliberately inciting a riot (there's also some double standards/selective enforcement of rules at work if this is compared to how these platforms treated the politicians and celebrities who endorsed violence from the other side of the political spectrum; such as the George Floyd Riots- even the George Floyd Protests violated COVID-19 social distancing regulations - and the CHAZ Insurrection).


Not having a go at you, I think it's an interesting discussion topic. We can discuss it in PM's if you'd like.
But you do have a point. Not having a go at you, I think it's an interesting discussion topic. We can discuss it in PM's or here if you'd like.