Topic on Talk:Femme Fatale
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Looney Toons in the topic "Should this page (and "Fille Fatale") have the No Real Life tag?" on Talk:Femme Fatale.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am hesitant to agree with NRL for both of these pages, if only because of historical (recent and not) examples that could fit -- [[Mata Hari]] and [[w:Amy Fisher|Amy Fisher]] both come immediately to mind. |
I am hesitant to agree with NRL for both of these pages, if only because of historical (recent and not) examples that could fit -- [[Mata Hari]] and [[w:Amy Fisher|Amy Fisher]] both come immediately to mind. |
||
If they do go NRL, I would note that the [[Spear Counterpart]] to [[Fille Fatale]], [[Kidanova]], has no problems with Real Life examples, regardless of how minimal as its section is. If underage eroticism is a concern for Fille Fatale, perhaps Kidanova should be rewritten to remove the implicit congratulations and encouragement a precociously amorous ''boy'' is offered by the article and its examples. |
If they do go NRL, I would note that the [[Spear Counterpart]] to [[Fille Fatale]], [[Kidanova]], has no problems with Real Life examples, regardless of how minimal as its section is. If underage eroticism is a concern for Fille Fatale, perhaps Kidanova should be rewritten to remove the implicit congratulations and encouragement a precociously amorous ''boy'' is offered by the article and its examples. (It's an interesting contrast -- a precocious girl is damaged or a danger, a precocious boy is to be celebrated.) |
||