Topic on User talk:Max Sinister

Line 1: Line 1:
If anything, the mistake was you bringing it up in the conversation ''completely unprompted:'' you're also presuming a lack of knowledge on the subject, which neither needs explaining nor remotely helps your case, and presuming "free speech for pedos" is anywhere near the goal absolutely isn't doing you any favors, either. LT and Geth've clearly stated the reasons for their views; the latter of them likely has an even stronger disdain for noncery, if anything, so this is preaching to the choir on top of everything else.
If anything, the mistake was you bringing it up in the conversation ''completely unprompted:'' you're also presuming a lack of knowledge on the subject, which neither needs explaining nor remotely helps your case, and presuming "free speech for pedos" is anywhere near the goal absolutely isn't doing you any favors, either. LT and Geth've clearly stated the reasons for their views; the latter of them likely has an even stronger disdain for noncery, if anything (EDIT: and wouldn't you know it, there's [[Topic:Sfq35p80vzlsa68o|an ancient-by-ATT-standards]] comment saying as much), so this is preaching to the choir on top of everything else.


As I said myself: we can make our distaste clear where needed without engaging in [[Don't Shoot the Message|Shooting the Message]], just because it isn't being denounced strongly ''enough'' for someone else's liking.
As I said myself: we can make our distaste clear where needed without engaging in [[Don't Shoot the Message|Shooting the Message]], just because it isn't being denounced strongly ''enough'' for someone else's liking.