Topic on Talk:Faux HTML Tags
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Ilikecomputers in the topic "Should we delete this sentence?" on Talk:Faux HTML Tags.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If we can't find a source for it, we can't validate the claim, therefore I vote yes. |
If we can't find a source for it, we can't validate the claim, therefore I vote yes. |
||
EDIT: |
|||
After some further research I think the person who edited it meant to say 'eXtensible Markup Language'. If my limited understanding of XML is correct, it introduces some new tags to allow it to go beyond a regular markup language, but still uses the fundamental structure of regular HTML. Therefore, some faux HTML tags may be actual XML tags. |
|||
https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/eXtensible_Markup_Language |
|||
https://www.w3.org/XML/ |
|||
Retracting my 'yes' vote and voting to replace the sentence with "Sometimes, the usage of these tags may actually be legitimate, in the <nowiki>[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML eXtensible Markup Language]]</nowiki>" |
|||