Toy Story (franchise)/Analysis: Difference between revisions

update links
(update links)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
{{Analysis}}{{work}}
== The Life and "Death" of a Toy ==
Say what you will about the first movie (what with all those [[Nightmare Fuel|mutant toys]] and [[Uncanny Valley]] humans), but the final [[Film]] arguably was the ''[[Toy Story (franchise)|Toy Story]]'' trilogy's darkest installment. Many may dismiss the reason for this as solely because the third movie was aimed toward those that saw the original ''[[Toy Story (franchise)|Toy Story]]'' in theaters fifteen years ago and grew up with the series - not only could the now-adolescent audience appreciate deeper themes such as abandonment and [[Character Development]], but if the final installment in the series didn't exceed the standards set by the previous two, then it would be a grave disappointment for the audience. However, there is more to this than [[Sequel Escalation]]. This was more than a mere adventure for the toys - their life with Andy, and their life metaphorically, ''ends'' in this film. The entire movie was symbolic of the afterlife, and the choices the toys make determine their ultimate fate.
 
'''The Attic: Purgatory'''
Line 29:
 
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Toy Story]]
[[Category:Analysis]]
[[Category:Toy Story{{TOPLEVELPAGE}}]]