Trope Enjoyment Loophole: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (Mass update links)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{tropeUseful Notes}}
ThisThe '''Trope Enjoyment Loophole''' is what happens when a trope normally is a [[Pet Peeve Trope]], but one particular example doesn't trigger the usual [[Berserk Button]], or the reverse, when a [[Favorite Trope]] is done in such a way as to hit said Button.
 
Why? Well, for the non-annoying example of a Pet Peeve Trope case (which is the one for which we'll be providing examples) there are a few possibilities:
Line 8:
* It could be because the trope is used in a [[Downplayed Trope|very understated way]] (yes, that character is very clearly [[Creator's Pet|the author's pet]], but he's only on screen for maybe two scenes per episode at most).
* It could be that it's being used in a sufficiently unusual way (it's not [[Black Comedy Rape]]; it's [[Rape as Drama]] being [[Kick the Dog|played by the rapist as comedy]]).
* It could be a case of an [[Intended Audience Reaction]] (we're supposed to find the [[Wangst|wangstywangst]]y teenager [[The Scrappy|annoying]], so that we understand when [[The Hero]] finally starts yelling at him).
* It could just be so well done that we forgive the writers ([[Actually Pretty Funny]]).
* It could be some species of [[Deconstructed Trope|deconstruction]] of the trope.
 
No examples, please. {{Noexamples|Given that this is an [[Audience Reaction]] derived from another Audience Reaction, specific examples in the main page would be problematic.}}
 
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Pages Needing Wicks{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Example Sectionectomy]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Wicks]]
[[Category:Audience Reactions]]
[[Category:Trope Enjoyment Loophole]]