100% Adoration Rating: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Jason taylor (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) m (punctuation fix) |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
*** Diana on the other hand, is nowhere near it, since the revelations about her true character came out. |
*** Diana on the other hand, is nowhere near it, since the revelations about her true character came out. |
||
* Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazilian president 2003-10, had the most universal acclaim of pretty much any leader in recent history, leaving office with an 87% approval rating. |
* Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Brazilian president 2003-10, had the most universal acclaim of pretty much any leader in recent history, leaving office with an 87% approval rating. |
||
* Effectively the purpose of Constitutional Monarchs. As no policy decisions are required of them, their main purpose is to look pretty(which is a more rigorous job then it sounds considering that they constantly have to look pretty and have to budget the time spent in human behavior)and essentially be a decoration for the state. Not all Constitutional Monarchs live up to that of course, and some people favor pure republics anyway. But that is the purpose. |
* Effectively the purpose of Constitutional Monarchs. As no policy decisions are required of them, their main purpose is to look pretty (which is a more rigorous job then it sounds considering that they constantly have to look pretty and have to budget the time spent in human behavior) and essentially be a decoration for the state. Not all Constitutional Monarchs live up to that of course, and some people favor pure republics anyway. But that is the purpose. |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |