Ad Hoc: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) (trope->useful notes) |
Derivative (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Useful Notes}} |
{{Useful Notes|wppage=Ad hoc hypothesis}} |
||
'''Ad Hoc''' ("To This") reasoning is where someone fails to understand that there is a difference between argument and explanation. The Ad Hoc fallacy is to give an after-the-fact explanation which doesn't apply to other situations. If we're interested in establishing A, and B is offered as evidence, the statement "A because B" is an argument. If we're trying to establish the truth of B, then "A because B" is not an argument, it's an explanation. |
'''Ad Hoc''' ("To This") reasoning is where someone fails to understand that there is a difference between argument and explanation. The Ad Hoc fallacy is to give an after-the-fact explanation which doesn't apply to other situations. If we're interested in establishing A, and B is offered as evidence, the statement "A because B" is an argument. If we're trying to establish the truth of B, then "A because B" is not an argument, it's an explanation. |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]] |
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]] |
||
[[Category:Ad Hoc]] |
[[Category:Ad Hoc]] |
||
[[Category:Pages with working Wikipedia tabs]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:12, 20 September 2021
Ad Hoc ("To This") reasoning is where someone fails to understand that there is a difference between argument and explanation. The Ad Hoc fallacy is to give an after-the-fact explanation which doesn't apply to other situations. If we're interested in establishing A, and B is offered as evidence, the statement "A because B" is an argument. If we're trying to establish the truth of B, then "A because B" is not an argument, it's an explanation.
It's a very common sight in justifying edits aimed at any supposedly negative trope, particularly if that edit calls upon things that might have happened to cause the item described.