Appeal to Ignorance: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(fixed wppage parm)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
{{tropeUseful Notes|wppage=Argument from ignorance}}
The claim that a statement is true because it has not been proven false, or that a statement is false because it has not been proven to be true. Famously refuted by [[Carl Sagan]] with the statement, "[[Absence of Evidence]] is not evidence of absence." Based on shifting the burden of proof onto whichever side of the argument you want to lose. If something can not be proven either way, just act like the opinion opposite of yours is inherently sillier, and you can assert that your position must be assumed correct until someone from the other side can prove you wrong. Usually involves an appeal to ''one's own'' authority and/or Burden of Proof Fallacy, and is essentially a claim of personal omnipotence; if the arguer cannot imagine a way for something to have happened, it is clearly impossible.
 
Line 6:
* Argument from Lack of Imagination
* Argument from Personal Incredulity
 
Not to be confused with [[Appeal to Obscurity]], where an example that the interlocutor is ignorant of is treated as proof against the interlocutor.
 
{{examples}}