| Display title | Blazing Saddles/Headscratchers |
| Default sort key | Blazing Saddles/Headscratchers |
| Page length (in bytes) | 5,387 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 75480 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
| Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
| Latest editor | HelveticaBold (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:22, 21 May 2016 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Magic word (1) | |
| Transcluded templates (5) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Concerning Blazing Saddles but other films more generally, why is Mel Brooks still allowed to work in Hollywood? Consider that in Blazing Saddles, his cast ran amock and disrupted the filming of a musical in the next soundstage, in Spaceballs a cameraman was killed by Dark Helmet and in Robin Hood: Men in Tights, Mel Brooks fire arrows of fire into an innocent village just to create the title sequence. |