But He Sounds Handsome: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
* In ''[[Code MENT]]'': |
* In ''[[Code MENT]]'': |
||
{{quote|'''Lelouch: "THAT ONE GUY SOUNDS LIKE A REALLY ''AWESOME'' DUDE!"'''}} |
{{quote|'''Lelouch: "THAT ONE GUY SOUNDS LIKE A REALLY ''AWESOME'' DUDE!"'''}} |
||
* The Gleick scandal. [http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/02/global-warming-alarmists-resort-to-hoax.php][http://climateaudit.org/2012/02/25/gleick-and-americas-dumbest-criminal/] [http://fakegate.org/] In 2012 Peter H. Gleick, co-founder and President of the Pacific Institute and a member of the National Academy of Sciences, obtained documents from the Heartland Institute via [[Phish|identity fraud]], and then anonymously "leaked" them, along with made up and laughably [[Strawman Fallacy|strawman]] "Confidential Memo". Gleick insists he received it in anonymous |
* The Gleick scandal. [http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/02/global-warming-alarmists-resort-to-hoax.php][http://climateaudit.org/2012/02/25/gleick-and-americas-dumbest-criminal/] [http://fakegate.org/] In 2012 Peter H. Gleick, co-founder and President of the Pacific Institute and a member of the National Academy of Sciences, obtained documents from the Heartland Institute via [[Phish|identity fraud]], and then anonymously "leaked" them, along with made up and laughably [[Strawman Fallacy|strawman]] "Confidential Memo". Gleick insists he received it in anonymous snail-mail (somehow without folding the paper he scanned), and ''then'' decided to go phish, but not only did some people recognize his style, the main reason why it was traced back to him so quickly is the most amusing and telltale part of said memo: |
||
{{quote|Efforts at places such as Forbes<ref>Forbes, of course, is relevant to this issue at all only because it's rather Gleick-friendly.</ref> are especially important now that they have begun to allow high-profile climate scientists (such as Gleick) […] }} |
{{quote|Efforts at places such as Forbes<ref>Forbes, of course, is relevant to this issue at all only because it's rather Gleick-friendly.</ref> are especially important now that they have begun to allow high-profile climate scientists (such as Gleick) […] }} |
||