Display title | Forum:Just curious: does tvtropes have a leg to stand on regarding "their" content? |
Default sort key | Just curious: does tvtropes have a leg to stand on regarding "their" content? |
Page length (in bytes) | 2,673 |
Namespace ID | 110 |
Namespace | Forum |
Page ID | 306124 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Topazan |
Date of page creation | 06:10, 29 December 2013 |
Latest editor | Dai-Guard (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 04:55, 7 May 2014 |
Total number of edits | 10 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I certainly never signed an agreement allowing my contributions to tvtropes to become FastEddie's private property. I don't understand how they can claim to own that content when it was created by community members who never agreed to relinquish control over it. |