Automoderated users, Autopatrolled users, Bureaucrats, Comment administrators, Confirmed users, Moderators, Rollbackers, Administrators
213,483
edits
Headscratchers/Multimedia: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) m (removed Category:Orphaned/Headscratchers/Other using HotCat) |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
* On the [[Trope Namer]] for [[Squick]] ([[Head-Tiltingly Kinky]], pun definitely intended), bone is kind of porous, and there's probably also a lot of tiny shards from the drill or saw, so wouldn't the squick initiator be causing a ''lot'' of probably irreversible damage to himself?
** Yes. Anyone performing this particular act must be a masochist as well as a sadist. And unlike with most other sex toys, you really can't go to the hospital and have them assist with removal without a ''lot'' of explaining to do. Perhaps it's a wilful thing, like a murder-suicide?
** O.K.,
** Supposedly it's the sound effect of cutting a hole in a skull and sticking male genitals in and out of the hole, provided there are still brains in the skull to make the noise. I question where the information was obtained--did Jeffrey Dahmer get inventive or something?
*** ...fucking ew...
Line 18:
** The way I figure it, it's a compromise between people who want no editing, people who want no cursing, and people who want to limit both as much as possible. If you obscure what the word actually ''is'', then it won't be obvious except to people who already know the word. Anyway, sh*t may not be a good example, since "shot" (as in bird- or buck-) can be used in place of the (sans-modifier) curse 90% of the time, albeit with the result being an odd manner of speaking.
{{tropesubpagefooter}}
__NOTOC__
| |||