Hollywood Tactics: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Undo revision 1559843 by Jason taylor (talk) breaks the article's flow) |
(→Film) |
||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
*** Which is something of an example-inside-an-example: why wouldn't there be more than two places for dedicated defenders to do this from? |
*** Which is something of an example-inside-an-example: why wouldn't there be more than two places for dedicated defenders to do this from? |
||
**** Because then the attackers would just go to this third place and use it to easily take out the bridge and engineering. Placing the two sets of controls in the two places that if you've already lost them both then you've lost control of the ship ''anyway'' is an acceptable design compromise. |
**** Because then the attackers would just go to this third place and use it to easily take out the bridge and engineering. Placing the two sets of controls in the two places that if you've already lost them both then you've lost control of the ship ''anyway'' is an acceptable design compromise. |
||
*** Probably someone delicately told the authors about those "gas mask" things that were introduced back in WWI, and that when a [[Boarding Party]] plans to visit an enemy spaceship (and one that uses [[Force Field Door]]s, at that) without closed suits with their own air supply, they use not even "Hollywood Tactics", but "[[Too Dumb to Live|Terminal Idiocy]]". Which makes gas flooding system obviously useless for the stated purpose, unless both sides are laughably unprepared otherwise. |
|||
** Worse: Remans are horribly light-sensitive, and none of them are wearing goggles. Did no one [[What an Idiot!|think to turn up the lights?]] |
** Worse: Remans are horribly light-sensitive, and none of them are wearing goggles. Did no one [[What an Idiot!|think to turn up the lights?]] |
||
** One [[MST|review]] pointed out that the climax of the movie hinges on the Enterprise's transporter systems being down. ''Every single person on board'' apparently forgot about the independent units in the shuttlecraft. Also, ''shuttlecraft''. |
** One [[MST|review]] pointed out that the climax of the movie hinges on the Enterprise's transporter systems being down. ''Every single person on board'' apparently forgot about the independent units in the shuttlecraft. Also, ''shuttlecraft''. |
||
| Line 171: | Line 172: | ||
*** By the way, why the heck were they carrying the full charge at a gallop? The horses would be winded and the formation disordered. |
*** By the way, why the heck were they carrying the full charge at a gallop? The horses would be winded and the formation disordered. |
||
**** We see that the charge started as a trot, shifted to a canter, and only increased to a full gallop shortly before making contact with enemy lines... which is exactly how you're supposed to be doing it. |
**** We see that the charge started as a trot, shifted to a canter, and only increased to a full gallop shortly before making contact with enemy lines... which is exactly how you're supposed to be doing it. |
||
== [[Literature]] == |
== [[Literature]] == |
||