Page history
2 August 2019
Robkelk
no edit summary
+119
Umbire the Phantom
Couple other fixes/typo cleanup
m+18
Umbire the Phantom
"Both are prejudices against religious groups and religions" is precisely where that similarity ends; the nature of the prejudices set them firmly apart, and ignoring that seems disingenuous. Furthermore, Garth Ennis is noted to be an atheist, and is critical of Christianity specifically based on apparent life experiences; I would think anyone promoting the idea that atheists HAVE to necessarily criticize all religions ever is probably feeding someone a line. Anyway, sprucing up the page further
−72
TieWrex
How is anti-Christian sentiment and anti-Islam sentiment a false equivalence? Both are prejudices against religious groups and religions and in each example the author wrote a comic series for the purpose of attacking a religious group and religion. On a side note, correct me if I'm wrong, for someone who said to dislike all religions, Garth Ennis' works only seem to attack Christianity and Christians.
−34
1 August 2019
Umbire the Phantom
no edit summary
+3
Umbire the Phantom
Yeah, not sure you've read either/both of those. Ignoring that Garth Ennis is pretty consistent about his views, the word "bigoted" combined with the context of your edit summary implies the blatantly false equivalency of anti-Christian views with anti-Islam ones. That ignores the several other themes Preacher actually explores in favor of comparing it to a work that actually exists for nothing else but an Islamophobic screed. Apples and oranges comparison motivated by apparent personal offense.
−44
115.70.44.117
Ennis' view of organized religion is a prejudiced one, and Preacher is similar to the anti-Islamic comic "Holy Terror" by Frank Miller (unlike Garth Ennis though, Miller was apologetic over his comic)
+63
31 July 2019
Looney Toons
Undo revision 1710930 by 115.70.44.117 (talk) insertion of opinion as undisputed fact
−92
115.70.44.117
no edit summary
+92