Jump to content

Elimination Houdini: Difference between revisions

m
clean up
m (update links)
m (clean up)
Line 2:
{{quote|"It looks like we've entered the middle phase of a typical reality TV contest. The weakest contestants left early, so instead of eliminating the person who did worst that week, they are going to get rid of the one who hasn't created any drama. Looks like Alex and Cameron will make it to the final episode." |Billie Green, [[Boycott the Caf]] reviews [[The Glee Project]] <ref>Cameron quit the next episode.</ref>}}
 
On competition-based [[Reality TV]], especially [[Talent Show|Talent Shows]]s, one needs to exhibit the talent or skill necessary to win in order to justify their continuing existence on the show. Some contestants just don't have that, and most are quickly jettisoned.
 
However, sometimes a weak contestant will cheat elimination week after week, horrible performance after horrible performance. This is an Elimination Houdini.
Line 8:
Personality can sometimes play a role, but it doesn't matter whether the contestant is a nice person or a [[Jerkass]]. There is one and only one trait required to be a Elimination Houdini: an utter lack of the talent necessary to win the show, especially in comparison to the other contestants, including those already eliminated.
 
It's not enough for a contestant to be deemed incompetent by a mere sizable portion of viewers, though. There needs to be an overwhelming consensus that the Elimination Houdini just doesn't belong on the show anymore. What's more, this sentiment should also be shared by the other contestants (for shows with [[Confession Cam|Confession Cams]]s) or the judges (where the home audience votes and the judges have little to no influence anymore).
 
And yet, somehow, they survive for weeks and weeks. In shows where the evictions are decided by judges, there may be [[Executive Meddling]] afoot, keeping a contestant on as a human [[Conflict Ball]] to drive up ratings. One the other hand, in shows with public votes, people will often vote to keep on a contestant who's [[So Bad It's Good|So Bad They're Good]] at the expense of technically superior opponents. Either way, it's enough to get some loyal viewers to not watch again... at least for a week or two. It's not uncommon for these people to develop [[Hatedom|a hatedom]] that takes on a life all its own.
 
There is also another form of [['''Elimination Houdini]]''', commonly seen in shows like ''[[Survivor]]'' in which the contestants vote people out and not the audience. They may be the second person or another target for elimination, but somehow manage to avoid it, and they can do it in several ways. Either they get lucky and someone makes a bone-headed move that gets ''them'' on the chopping block instead, they instead gun for a different threat, a [[Non Gameplay Elimination]] spares them a round, or the [['''Elimination Houdini]]''' manages to talk their way out of elimination and avoids death. If the players are moderately [[Genre Savvy]], a bad player may become a Houdini through stronger players actively protecting them - why knock them out now when they could be easy competition in the finals? Often this happens when [[Tall Poppy Syndrome]] kicks up.
 
It is actually fully possible for the [['''Elimination Houdini]]''' to ''win''. In shows about alliances, they may be somewhat of a "Deadly Floater" who floats along then slips through the cracks in alliances, or plays enough of a social game their [[Entitled Bastard]] opponent(s) get a good "Not you!" in the final round. Or, in a talent-based show, they have a fanbase who votes for them because they want to see them continue. Maybe they're [[So Bad It's Good]].
 
The inverse is a [[Shocking Elimination]], in which a favored contestant is cut earlier than expected, many times in the place of the Elimination Houdini.
{{examples|Examples: }}
 
* Every season of ''[[American Idol]]'' has had at least one [['''Elimination Houdini]]''', usually endorsed by VoteForTheWorst.com:
** Season 1 had Nikki Mckibbin
** Season 2 had Carmen Rasmusen and Josh Gracin (mostly because for the one time he escaped the bottom two while Ruben Studdard didn't)
Line 77:
* The judges on ''America's Got Talent'' have sent a few EH-wannabes to the semifinals over some more deserving talent (e.g. Ronny B and Indiggo over Xclusive and Lil Countrie & Page 1ne in Season 3). Still, thanks to mass exodus eliminations, the audience has mostly avoided giving most of them another chance. David & Dania being the reason for the word "most," as they made it to the final round despite using the exact same routine ''every time''.
** It may be a general talent show, but god help you if you aren't a singer. A lot of rather mediocre singers go forward, while other types of talent are eliminted after the second round because "That's the same thing we saw last time." The abovementioned David was called back for a third performance because he called the judges on this, saying (paraphrased) "A singer only has to come onstage with a new song to sing. You expect us to change a magic act that took decades to perfect?"
** On the other hand, one could say that the ultimate [['''Elimination Houdini]]''' was Donald Braswell of Season 3. Who, thanks to an injury to a high-risk act that made the top 40, won the right to replace them. And made the top 5. Of course, many would argue he was actually snubbed from the top 40 to begin with.
*** Hello, Season 5 judges! You're reviewing all the acts again and are trying to pick the good from the bad! Fantastic! What's that? Ronith deserves a spot?! OK, maybe he is kinda [[So Bad It's Good]], I guess I can MARY ELLEN?!!?!.
* Some contestants from ''[[The Apprentice (TV series)|The Apprentice]]'' have managed to avoid being fired numerous times despite their collective screw-ups. Omarosa is the prime example, though Lenny from season 5 is another good one off the top of my head.
Line 83:
** ''[[Celebrity Apprentice]]'' can be really bad about this since Trump will often keep a contestant who is a bad manager, screws up all the time and is despised by others on his/her team. The person is simply too big a source of entertainment for the audience to fire yet.
*** Gary Busey was a prime example. He screwed this up, acted like he was a complete loon and yet Trump went out of his way to keep him despite EVERYONE agreeing that Busey should go.
* The first ''WWE Diva Search'' featured Carmella De Cesare, who made it all the way to the final before losing at the very end, thus taking second place overall. She had managed to become so universally hated that it's seriously believed they deliberately fudged the votes and kept her on just so people would keep waiting to see her finally get eliminated (and thus hopefully keep watching.) This is the WWE, after all--totallyall—totally scripted [[Face]] vs. [[Heel]] matchups is what they do. Her existence was finally justified when, just before the winner was announced, Trish Stratus took both competitors apart in a [[Crowning Moment of Awesome]].
* Virginia from season 2 of ''[[Hell's Kitchen|Hells Kitchen]]'' actually made it to the finals. She choked under pressure, was on the chopping block a lot, yet survived by sole virtue of luck (and perhaps Gordon Ramsay's hard-on for her). There was also Bonnie from Season 3 who may have gotten to the finals for the same reason (though she did at least improve dramatically after the teams were merged).
** Melissa from Season 3 and Jen from Season 4 were somewhat talented, but were also [[Control Freak]] egomaniacs who were repeatedly nominated because their terrible attitudes made them impossible to work with; both lasted to the point where Ramsay challenged the teams to come up with their own menus, and both proceeded to fill the menu with their own ideas.
*** Colleen from Season 5, as she has demonstrated frighteningly poor cooking skills for a cooking school instructor (with Gordon so mortified that he actually accused her of robbing her students) and attitude problems. When she finally was eliminated, however, Gordon praised her determination, and she came back at the start of Season 6 to deliver a video greeting and advice to the new cooks.
*** Seth and Lacey from the same season count. Seth was an egomaniac who refused to admit to his mistakes and screwed up '''really''' badly on every single service he was in; Lacey had a selfish, crybaby attitude and could hardly cook at all. Either Lacey or the aforementioned Colleen would have been gone by the second episode, but Ji (one of the frontrunners) decided to step out due to an injury. Seth survived two nominations over better chefs (Wil and Charlie) before being eliminated, but Lacey somehow managed to last long enough to get in the final 8 (at which point she was eliminated ''during'' a challenge!)
*** Another example of an [['''Elimination Houdini]]''' winning is Christina from Season 4, who was nominated a total of five times, including in the penultimate round; compare to runner-up Petrozza, who was only nominated once, and then only because he chose to nominate himself rather than one of his teammates, causing Gordon to praise his selflessness and call him a "true gentleman".
**** Not entirely sure Christina counts. The woman's team that season was incredibly catty, and all but admitted that they were just trying to sneak her elimination through.
*** Fran from the current season (season 7) can certainly be added to this list. Not only has she been put up for elimination every single time her team has lost a service (which, mostly due to her mistakes, has been almost every single time this season, she's been permitted to stay over more capable chefs. Salvatore from the other team also counts, but he's gone now, though he mainly survived because his team beat the other one just about every time.
Line 193:
 
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Home Page/YMMV]]
[[Category:Reality TV Tropes]]
[[Category:YMMV Trope]]
10,856

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.