Anonymous user
The Spoony Experiment/Headscratchers: Difference between revisions
The Spoony Experiment/Headscratchers (view source)
Revision as of 13:41, 17 November 2016
, 7 years agono edit summary
m (Mass update links) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 82:
** Burton would probably show up at the end of the Final Fantasy X-2 reviews.
* Can someone explain to me if Spoony changed its criteria about judging movies recently??? because When he review Tranformers 3 he said that just a few awesome things happening at the last hour cannot redeem the movie for the sheer bullshit that you have to endure (ok fair enough, after all 90% of crap arent worth the 10% of whatever coolness may have) BUT THEN in some vlog that i cant remember well right now (UPDATE: It was the Eclipse Vlog) he said something about Sin City that baffled me. He said that he could have enjoyed the movie if it wasnt for Jessica Alba performance and it just ruined the whole experience. Ehm....what? how this makes any sense? so in one case we got crap that overwhelms the good bits but THEN in another case just one thing manages to ruin all the movie experience and cant let it go? how can a single moment ruin a entire experience even if in the long run the whole thing was satisfactory?
Line 104 ⟶ 103:
[[Category:The Spoony Experiment]]
[[Category:Headscratchers]]
|