39,327
edits
Avatar (film)/Headscratchers/Earth: Difference between revisions
update links
Derivative (talk | contribs) m (Fixing links to disambiguation pages) |
(update links) |
||
Line 23:
* It's not so much that we'd necessarily care for an alien race, it's that we despise the "HUMANITY FUCK YEAH KILL THE XENOS" people enough to side with the aliens. I'd happily see such people dead, might bump the IQ of the species up a few points.
** Hey, it's better than Navikin. Much, much better than the Navikin.
* Being xenocidal does not necessarily mean you are less intelligent. Given that this is a hard scifi setting were relativistic kill vehicles are possible(ie like real life). The smartest move a species can make may be to destroy all other sapient lifeforms. [[Warhammer
** It's not hard sci-fi at all; the Na'vi have no way of deploying relativistic kill vehicles; and please stop quoting Warhammer. It makes you sound like a drooling sociopathic tool. It's the least realistic setting ever.
*** No FTL, fairly plausible if poorly designed vehicles, modified versions of things that we already have, and a reasonable handwave of FTL communications? Sounds like hard scifi to me, if you'll excuse the [[Lego Genetics]]. Also, of course the Na'vi can't deploy the [[RK Vs]], that's what the [[Humans Are the Real Monsters|humans]] are supposed to do. Just face it, the only reason the Na'vi are still alive is because morality is a [[Restraining Bolt]] on the [[Humans Are Warriors|human's]] infinitely superior firepower. And because of the [[Zerg Rush]].
| |||