Titus Andronicus (theatre)/Funny: Difference between revisions

Everything About Fiction You Never Wanted to Know.
Content added Content deleted
m (Dai-Guard moved page Titus Andronicus (Theatre)/Funny to Titus Andronicus (theatre)/Funny: Use lowercase namespaces)
m (Mass update links)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{work}}
{{work}}
* Even ''[[Titus Andronicus (Theatre)|Titus Andronicus]]'' has a moment that always brings the house down:
* Even ''[[Titus Andronicus (theatre)|Titus Andronicus]]'' has a moment that always brings the house down:
** In scene (3.1) Aaron promises Titus two of his sons returned alive if he or one of his family will give the Emperor a hand. Literally. The request is definitely not funny- it's pointless and cruel- but the argument about whose hand will go is easily played for a laugh.
** In scene (3.1) Aaron promises Titus two of his sons returned alive if he or one of his family will give the Emperor a hand. Literally. The request is definitely not funny- it's pointless and cruel- but the argument about whose hand will go is easily played for a laugh.
* The latter half of Act 3, Scene 2:
* The latter half of Act 3, Scene 2:

Revision as of 09:51, 16 April 2014


  • Even Titus Andronicus has a moment that always brings the house down:
    • In scene (3.1) Aaron promises Titus two of his sons returned alive if he or one of his family will give the Emperor a hand. Literally. The request is definitely not funny- it's pointless and cruel- but the argument about whose hand will go is easily played for a laugh.
  • The latter half of Act 3, Scene 2:

 Titus: "What dost thou strike at, Marcus, with thy knife?"

Marcus: "At that that I have killed, my lord- a fly."

Titus: "Out on thee, murderer! ...Poor harmless fly, that with his pretty buzzing melody came here to make us merry, and you have killed him!"

  • Then, when Marcus says that the fly reminded him of Aaron the Moor, Tamora's vicious lover, he stabs the already-dead insect multiple times. And then lampshades the impassioned foolishness of it all.
    • The above sequence was added some years after the play was originally written, and it has always seemed to me to be a tongue-in-cheek jibe by the author at the sensationalism of his early work.