Topic on User talk:NormAtredies

Line 1: Line 1:
I admit I did do some editorializing and added loaded language, I contend that the points I presented about those works are facts, not whitewashing. Whitewashing is covering things up, where and how was I doing that?
I admit I did do some editorializing and added loaded language, I also contend that the points I presented about those works are facts, not whitewashing. Whitewashing is covering things up, where and how was I doing that?


For example, on the edit history you linked, where I elaborated on Stephen King's book "Carrie"; "(in fact, Margaret's backstory involved her trying to join other Christian Fundamentalist groups but being rejected due to being '''[[Everyone Has Standards|too extreme, even for them]]'''). The story also shows that Margaret's beliefs and behavior actually have more to do with her [[Marital Rape License|abusive husband]] than any particular denomination's teachings." this is in the novel itself. Or when I added those points relating to the TV show Bones about their jab at creationists (look up the episode "The Archaeologist in the Cocoon"); while I editorialized, [https://bones.fandom.com/wiki/The_Archeologist_in_the_Cocoon that's exactly what happens in the episode].
For example, on the edit history you linked, where I elaborated on Stephen King's book "Carrie"; "(in fact, Margaret's backstory involved her trying to join other Christian Fundamentalist groups but being rejected due to being '''[[Everyone Has Standards|too extreme, even for them]]'''). The story also shows that Margaret's beliefs and behavior actually have more to do with her [[Marital Rape License|abusive husband]] than any particular denomination's teachings." this is in the novel itself. Or when I added those points relating to the TV show Bones about their jab at creationists (look up the episode "The Archaeologist in the Cocoon"); while I editorialized, [https://bones.fandom.com/wiki/The_Archeologist_in_the_Cocoon that's exactly what happens in the episode].