Topic on User talk:Arlo James Barnes

Line 1: Line 1:
> If you actually have new content about Ohlmarks' other writing we can negotiate thisIf you actually have new content about Ohlmarks' other writing we can negotiate this
> If you actually have new content about Ohlmarks' other writing we can negotiate thisIf you actually have new content about Ohlmarks' other writing we can negotiate this


I don't understand what you mean by negotiate but I am of course happy to improve the article as is within my research abilities. I'm honestly surprised it was a controversial edit, I thought a literary person would get a creator page and an essay about aspects of one instance of their creative output would fit well as a subjective ('your mileage may vary') subpage. If I was completely wrongheaded about this, those edits can be reverted with no fear of hurting my feelings or anything, I just want to understand.
I don't understand what you mean by negotiate but I am of course happy to improve the article as is within my research abilities. I'm honestly surprised it was a controversial edit, I thought a literary person would get a creator page and an essay about aspects of one instance of their creative output would fit well as a subjective ('your mileage may vary') subpage. If I was completely wrongheaded about this, those edits can be reverted with no fear of hurting my feelings or anything [and I see now have been], I just want to understand.