User:Uladox/'Pataphysics

Please note that I am no longer a pataphysician, if I ever was one to begin with. Although, just like dadists, it might be the case that those who do not identify as pataphysicians might be the most true pataphysicians. While a big part of the pataphysical is uselessness, 'Pataphysics, by (some of) its definition(s), cannot help containing the useful or having a subset of particularly useful ideas. There's the pataphor, the anomaly, the syzygy, and the clinamen. I'd like to work on something somewhat related to 'Pataphysics by these means, but only tangentially so since the anomaly has many ways of being looked at. I might try something of a grand synthesis. -- Uladox(talk) 03:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)