Display title | Aggressive Categorism |
Default sort key | Aggressive Categorism |
Page length (in bytes) | 8,900 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 125757 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects) |
Page image | |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | m>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 21:00, 4 July 2021 |
Total number of edits | 11 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (5) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Bob knows that Alice is stupid: She's a woman, and women are stupid - never mind that Alice has a PHD and an IQ of 150, she's still a woman... and women are stupid, thus Alice is stupid. If Bob finally accepts that Alice is indeed smart, he might resort to claiming that she is not "really" a woman. Bonus points if Bob uses Alice not being stupid as an example of the principle that women are stupid - either because she's too smart to be a real woman, or as "the exception that verifies the rule". Also bonus points if "Alice" isn't even a woman, and Bob simply assumed a neutral Internet nickname to be female because he thinks the person is stupid. Alternatively, Alice actually does something stupid one single time - and Bob draws the conclusion that she is (and all other women are) always stupid. |