Broke the Rating Scale: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(update links)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
* '''Type 5:''' And the [[Logical Extreme]], the reviewer simply—and often explicitly -- ''refuses to assign a rating at all.'' This can be because the reviewer found the work downright repulsive, or the reviewer found the work to be unworthy of a rating, or it could be because the reviewer decided that a rating was otherwise inapplicable. Sometimes overlaps with [[Dancing Bear]].
* '''Type 5:''' And the [[Logical Extreme]], the reviewer simply—and often explicitly -- ''refuses to assign a rating at all.'' This can be because the reviewer found the work downright repulsive, or the reviewer found the work to be unworthy of a rating, or it could be because the reviewer decided that a rating was otherwise inapplicable. Sometimes overlaps with [[Dancing Bear]].



Not to be confused with [[Readings Are Off the Scale]]
{{examples}}
{{examples}}
== Type 0 -- We don't hand out 0's, but maybe we should have for this. ==
== Type 0 -- We don't hand out 0's, but maybe we should have for this. ==