Information for "Golden Mean Fallacy"

Basic information

Display titleGolden Mean Fallacy
Default sort keyGolden Mean Fallacy
Page length (in bytes)38,583
Namespace ID0
Page ID30102
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page1
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects)
Page imageSemicontrolled demolition.png

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorprefix>Import Bot
Date of page creation21:27, 1 November 2013
Latest editorWonderBot (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit00:17, 18 August 2023
Total number of edits17
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (17)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Most people know that there are two sides to every issue: their side, and the wrong side. Authors (and people in general) who subscribe to the Golden Mean Fallacy have another outlook. They believe that there are in fact three sides: the side of the complete morons to the left of them, the side of the complete morons to the right of them, and their own side, which combines the good points of each in sublime harmony while avoiding all the bad. If one position is argued to be superior solely because it is in the middle, then this is the logical fallacy of Argument to Moderation.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO