| Display title | J.J. Abrams/WMG |
| Default sort key | J.J. Abrams/WMG |
| Page length (in bytes) | 942 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 165777 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | m>Import Bot |
| Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
| Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 17:55, 21 October 2018 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Magic word (1) | |
| Transcluded templates (3) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Everyone complained bitterly about the excessive use of lens flare in Star Trek. But having watched Fringe, I'm beginning to wonder if that wasn't completely intentional and symbolic. Basically, whenever there's a lens flare, that's Abrams saying "hey, we're in an alternate universe." In Fringe, that only happens some of the time, when they're Over There; in Star Trek, on the other hand, the entire film takes place in an alternate universe (created when Nero went back in time). Thus, the entire movie is filled with lens flare. |