Off on a Technicality: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
(→‎Literature: Replaced redirects)
 
Line 66: Line 66:
* ''[[Honor Harrington]]'': In ''The Short Victorious War'', Harrington learns the reason Young was not removed from command after the events in “On Basilisk Station”. He used a [[Loophole Abuse|loophole]] to give his return to the shipyard for repairs a legal basis.
* ''[[Honor Harrington]]'': In ''The Short Victorious War'', Harrington learns the reason Young was not removed from command after the events in “On Basilisk Station”. He used a [[Loophole Abuse|loophole]] to give his return to the shipyard for repairs a legal basis.
** Specifically, if all of a ship's senior officers testify in writing that a starship requires emergency repairs, then regulations require that it return to the shipyard ASAP for emergency repairs. Even if it could actually have gone months more before needing maintenance.
** Specifically, if all of a ship's senior officers testify in writing that a starship requires emergency repairs, then regulations require that it return to the shipyard ASAP for emergency repairs. Even if it could actually have gone months more before needing maintenance.
* In [[Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire|the fourth]] [[Harry Potter]] book, it was revealed that, when Lord Voldemort murdered his muggle father and his father's parents, the [[Muggles]] believed Frank Bryce, the caretaker of the mansion where he lived, committed the murders. Bryce was not charged because the forensics experts failed to establish a cause of death - the Killing Curse doesn't leave signs that can be noticed without magic - but the villagers remained sure Bryce was guilty...somehow.
* In [[Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (novel)||the fourth]] ''[[Harry Potter]]'' book, it was revealed that, when Lord Voldemort murdered his muggle father and his father's parents, the [[Muggles]] believed Frank Bryce, the caretaker of the mansion where he lived, committed the murders. Bryce was not charged because the forensics experts failed to establish a cause of death - the Killing Curse doesn't leave signs that can be noticed without magic - but the villagers remained sure Bryce was guilty...somehow.
* In the [[H. Beam Piper]] story "Lone Star Planet", set on [[Everything Is Big in Texas|New Texas]], the new Solar League ambassador, Stephen Silk, has to arrange this for the three men who assassinated the last Ambassador. The logic was that on New Texas, politicians are defined as ''literal'' [[Acceptable Targets]] - you're only punished for killing a politician if the court's opinion is that said pollie didn't have it coming - and this specialised court was the venue for the assassination trial. However, defining ambassadors as practicing politicians would lead to some very awkward precedent, meaning that Silk has to first build a conclusive case around them, then remind everyone that it's the wrong court, and New Texan double jeopardy laws meant there couldn't be a retrial. {{spoiler|Of course, since it's a cowboy planet, you can freely carry guns into court unless you're the defendant, and after the verdict of "technically not guilty and it's a damn shame" is handed down, Silk proves that there's no technicality that will get you off a bullet through the head by gunning down all three at once. Quoth the judge: "Court-is-hereby-adjourned-until-0900-tomorrow-''hit-the-deck!''"}}
* In the [[H. Beam Piper]] story "Lone Star Planet", set on [[Everything Is Big in Texas|New Texas]], the new Solar League ambassador, Stephen Silk, has to arrange this for the three men who assassinated the last Ambassador. The logic was that on New Texas, politicians are defined as ''literal'' [[Acceptable Targets]] - you're only punished for killing a politician if the court's opinion is that said pollie didn't have it coming - and this specialised court was the venue for the assassination trial. However, defining ambassadors as practicing politicians would lead to some very awkward precedent, meaning that Silk has to first build a conclusive case around them, then remind everyone that it's the wrong court, and New Texan double jeopardy laws meant there couldn't be a retrial. {{spoiler|Of course, since it's a cowboy planet, you can freely carry guns into court unless you're the defendant, and after the verdict of "technically not guilty and it's a damn shame" is handed down, Silk proves that there's no technicality that will get you off a bullet through the head by gunning down all three at once. Quoth the judge: "Court-is-hereby-adjourned-until-0900-tomorrow-''hit-the-deck!''"}}
* The district attorney in the book version of ''[[Clear and Present Danger]]'' takes pride in the fact that he has ''never'' lost a case on technical grounds. This is not same same as never losing a case ever, but is still impressive.
* The district attorney in the book version of ''[[Clear and Present Danger]]'' takes pride in the fact that he has ''never'' lost a case on technical grounds. This is not same same as never losing a case ever, but is still impressive.
Retrieved from "https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Off_on_a_Technicality"