Sinkhole: Difference between revisions

Line 16:

The reader has no clue there are multiple links there. If they ''do'' discover all the links, it is a pain following all the links. Don't do this, please. It's an [http://blogaccessibility.com/sin-2-of-inaccessible-blogs-using-consecutive-one-worded-links/ accessibility sin].

⚫

'''[[All Blue Entry]] Attempts:''' Even worse is an attempt to create an [[All Blue Entry]] or All Green Entry under the idea that it's witty or novel. It's not. (The fact that this has a name shows that it isn't novel.) Gratuitous sinkholes should be removed from such examples.

⚫

'''Covert Opinions:''' Too many times sinkholes are used to bury a subjective trope in an example or description. These are bad. If you see one of these, remove the unnecessary links and/or restructure the necessary ones.

⚫

'''Covert Opinions:''' Too many times sinkholes are used to bury a subjective trope, Audience Reaction or something mistaken for one (e.g. [[Flat What]]) in an example or description. These are bad, so if you see one of these, remove the unnecessary links and/or restructure the necessary ones.

⚫

'''[[All Blue Entry]] Attempts:''' An attempt to create an [[All Blue Entry]] or All Green Entry under the ~~pretense~~ that it's witty or novel. ~~This is~~ not ~~the case~~. (The fact that this has a name shows that it isn't novel.) Gratuitous sinkholes should be removed from such examples.

'''Linking a Common Phrase to a Trope of the Same Name:''' For example, linking a statement that someone "got better" in some way, shape or form to the trope [[I Got Better]]; that is part of why the trope was renamed to [[Unexplained Recovery]].