Jump to content

Alternate History Wank: Difference between revisions

m
update links
mNo edit summary
m (update links)
Line 8:
There is disagreement on what constitutes a Wank. Is a Greater [[Romania]] timeline where Romania controls all the regions it claimed in the early 20th century a Wank, or would Romania have to dominate the whole of the Balkans? But if Romania controls ''all Europe,'' the timeline ''probably'' is an [[Alternate History Wank]].
 
The disagreement on this is like the disagreement on what makes a [[Mary Sue]]. Some maintain that to be considered an Alternate History Wank, an alternate timeline must be by nature implausible or even invoke [[Alien Space Bats]] ''after the point of divergence.'' For others, it just has to show favoritism. One common result of this, however, is the fact that individual nations tend to be assimilated into large multinational single-state power blocs, with the end result in extreme cases being that [[Space -Filling Empire|the entire world is divided between two or three super-empires]] -- all of which tend to be dominated by one main national or cultural group (which, perhaps not coincidentally, is usually that which [[Write What You Know|the author finds it easiest to identify with and / or write about]]). This tends to result in a situation where, as with the page image, the map of the world can essentially be shaded with two or three colours.
 
Wanks tend to be characterised not solely by the success of a nation or other cause, but the fact that it is treated as [[Born Lucky]]: everything always goes its way, when an issue turning against it just once would have disastrous consequences. Using [[The Draka]] as an example, no-one seems to notice this vast evil empire growing in Africa and react to it until after it has already overrun the Ottoman Empire. The United States in particular is sometimes said to embody the closest thing to this in [[Real Life]]: Bismarck famously is believed to have said "there is a special providence that protects fools, drunkards, and the United States of America." Basically it can sometimes be difficult to tell whether the work in question is a wank or not, especially in light of the historical achievements of certain nations or individuals. If Alexander the Great had been a fictional character in an alternate history work then his rapid conquest and creation of a gigantic empire in a very short period of time would likely have been labeled a wank, however Alexander the Great ''did'' exist and ''did'' create a gigantic empire in a short period of time so wanks, unless they are clear-cut cases like the Drakaverse, are not always very easy to spot.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.