Jump to content

Schrödinger's Cat: Difference between revisions

Gave the article a thorough cleaning.
No edit summary
(Gave the article a thorough cleaning.)
Line 1:
{{Useful Notes|wppage=Schrödinger's cat in popular culture}}
{{#ev:youtube|CrxqTtiWxs4|480|right||frame}}
{{quote|"Do you know that thought experiment with the cat in the box with the poison? Theory requires the cat be both alive and dead until observed. Well, I actually performed the experiment. Dozens of times. The bad news is that reality doesn't exist. The good news is we have a new cat graveyard."|'''[[GLaDOS]]''', ''[[Portal 2]]: Lab Rat''}}
 
The {{w|Schrödinger's Cat}} thought experiment is an increasingly popular [[Motif]] in fiction. Erwin Schrödinger originally presented it to demonstrate how the {{w|Copenhagen interpretation}}, the classic interpretation of quantum mechanics, was utterly idiotic. It has since been appropriated by the general public; the pop-culture version of the experiment now serves as a metaphor for uncertainty of the [[Truth and Lies|truth]], [[Sliding Scale of Fate vs. Free Will|fate]], Quantum Physics, [[Quantum Mechanics Can Do Anything|how quantum physics can do anything]], and whatever the hell is inside that box. Schrödinger's name has itself become a byword to invoke these ideas, among the general public, and on [[This Very Wiki]]. When used in a work of fiction, it can either show off the [[Author Appeal|writer's]] [[Genius Bonus|cleverness]], or [[Did Not Do the Research|lack of research]]. (Possibly both at the same time.)
The [http://tinyurl.com/8n2bm Schrodinger's Cat thought experiment] is increasing in popularity as a [[Motif]] in fiction. To elaborate, Erwin Schrödinger's thought experiment involved a cat sealed inside a box with a Geiger counter attached to it. Inside that Geiger counter is a small amount of radioactive substance. The box is set up so that when the radioactive substance decays, a device smashes a vial of toxic gas, killing the cat inside. The thing is, after an hour, until the box is open, there is ''no way'' to determine whether the cat inside is alive or dead, thus allowing the cat to be ''both'' alive and dead.
 
In quantum mechanics, things like subatomic particles routinely exist in superpositions of states, and correct predictions of the outcomes of certain experiments can only be made by taking these effects into account.<ref>A classical example is the double-slit experiment for electrons where the resulting interference pattern is only expected if you assume the electron is in a superposition of states</ref> In this case, we're dealing with radioactive nuclei; a nucleus is at the center of an atom, and some nuclei are radioactive, so they undergo something called "radioactive decay". Heisenberg's {{w|Uncertainty Principle}} shows that it's impossible to directly observe this decay; we're dealing with particles so small that any equipment we have to monitor them would interfere with what they're doing. Even using the smallest equipment available to us, such as photons and electrons), it is impossible to get a complete picture on the state of an electron at any given moment; we can get reliable results about an electron's position, or we can get reliable results about its momentum, but we can't get reliable results of ''both''. Therefore, the best we can say about any particular radioactive nucleus is that, at any given moment, it [[Captain Obvious|may either be decayed or undecayed]]; that much isn't controversial.
The thought experiment was originally a critique of the [[wikipedia:Copenhagen interpretation|Copenhagen interpretation]] of Quantum Physics, where the cat can be [[Mind Screw|living and dead at the same time]] as a superposition of "realities". <ref>According to the Copenhagen equation, the cat is 50% alive and 50% dead.</ref> The paradox should be obvious. Note that the paradox only exists in the Copenhagen interpretation, the classic interpretation of quantum mechanics. According to the many-worlds interpretation, what actually happens is that ''the entire world'' splits into a superposition of worlds where the cat is alive, and those where it is dead.
 
The Copenhagen interpretation says that, because of this, each particle is both decayed and undecayed ''[[Mind Screw|at the same time]]'', in a superposition of "realities".<ref>According to the Copenhagen equation, the particle is 50% decayed and 50% undecayed.</ref> Schrödinger, however, thought that this idea was [[Insane Troll Logic|obviously flawed]]. So, he presented the following thought experiment:
The reason the experiment is interesting is that in quantum mechanics, things like subatomic particles ''routinely'' exist in superpositions of states, and correct predictions of the outcomes of certain experiments can only be made by taking these effects into account<ref>A classical example is the double-slit experiment for electrons where the resulting interference pattern is only expected if you assume the electron is in a superposition of states</ref>. The experiment posits that if we can accept that small particles (like the radioactive trigger) can be in these kinds of states, then we have to accept that large objects (like the cat) can also be in these kinds of states, raising the question of why we don't routinely observe that.
* Imagine a cat sealed inside a box. There is a Geiger counter attached to the box, which itself is hooked up to a device primed to break open a vial of toxic gas inside the box, killing the cat inside.
* Inside the Geiger counter is a small amount of radioactive substance. The toxic gas device will only go off when the radioactive substance decays.
* The box is secure; until it is opened, there is no way to conclusively determine whether the cat is alive or dead.
* The cat is left in this box for an hour.
TheSo thoughtif, experiment was originally a critique ofby the [[wikipedia:Copenhagen interpretation|Copenhagen, interpretation]]the ofradioactive Quantumsubstance Physics, wherein the catcounter canis beboth [[Mind Screw|livingdecayed and deadundecayed, atthat themust samemean time]]that asthe adevice superpositionis ofboth "realities".triggered <ref>Accordingand to the Copenhagenuntriggered; equationtherefore, the cat inside is 50% alive and 50% dead at the same time.</ref> The paradox should be obvious. <ref>Note that the paradox only exists in the Copenhagen interpretation, the classic interpretation of quantum mechanics. According to the many-worlds interpretation, what actually happens is that ''the entire world''universe splits into a superposition of worlds[[Alternate Universe|alternate realities]]: some in wherewhich the cat is alive, and thosesome wherein which it is dead.</ref>
 
The Schrödinger's Cat experiment thus posits that if we can accept that small particles (like the radioactive trigger) can routinely be in these kinds of states, then we have to accept that large objects (like the cat) can also be in these kinds of states, raising the question of why we don't routinely observe that.
This thought experiment immediately became popular as a metaphor for uncertainty of the [[Truth and Lies|truth]], [[Sliding Scale of Fate vs. Free Will|fate]], Quantum Physics, [[Quantum Mechanics Can Do Anything|how quantum physics can do anything]], and whatever the hell is inside that box. Ironically though, the original experiment was used to show how ''stupid'' the idea of superposition was.
 
To elaborate further, we're dealing with radioactive nuclei; a nucleus is at the centre of an atom, and some nuclei are radioactive, so they do something called "radioactive decay". [[wikipedia:Uncertainty principle|Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle]] shows that it's impossible to directly observe this decay because it involves particles so small that any equipment we have to monitor them—even the smallest, like photons and electrons—would interfere with what they're doing, so we can't get reliable results about an electron's both momentum and position—one or the other, but not both. Therefore, any particular radioactive nucleus may, at any moment, be either decayed, or undecayed. That much isn't controversial.
 
The [[wikipedia:Copenhagen interpretation|Copenhagen interpretation]] says that, because of this, each particle is 50% decayed and 50% undecayed. Schrödinger thought that this idea was [[Insane Troll Logic]], so he extended it to show: if the decay of a radioactive nucleus will set off a device which will release toxic gas into a box that contains a cat, and if (as per the Copenhagen interpretation) the nucleus is 50% decayed and 50% undecayed, the device is 50% triggered and 50% untriggered, so the cat is simultaneously 50% killed and 50% still alive.
 
Sometimes though, it's just used to show off the [[Author Appeal|writer's]] [[Genius Bonus|cleverness]]. Or [[Did Not Do the Research|lack of research.]]
 
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CrxqTtiWxs4 Here's a video] that explains the principle in question.
 
As you might know, even [[This Very Wiki]] is fond of using this. It's the [[Trope Namer]] for:
 
{{tropenamer}}
* [[Schrödinger's Butterfly]]: The story is both real and [[All Just a Dream]] simultaneously.
* [[Schrödinger's Cast]]: A character is both alive and dead simultaneously, in different versions of the story.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.