Sound, Valid, True: Difference between revisions
m
clean up
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) (BR cleanup) |
m (clean up) |
||
Line 1:
{{trope}}
In logic, "sound", "valid", and "true" ''are not synonymous''. The premises and conclusion can be "true" or "false"; the chain of reasoning itself can be "valid" or "invalid"; the argument as a whole is either "sound" or "unsound".
Line 28:
A perfect (deductive) argument. It is true and valid, and therefore sound. In other words, the argument must be based on accurate information and not contain any errors in logic.
Of course, the above only refers to deductive logic. When it comes to induction, things get a bit more dicey. (Literally.)
Line 38:
Therefore, Brahim is Muslim. }}
This is what is called a ''strong'' inductive argument: more likely to be true than false. It's invalid: we only know that Brahim is Moroccan.<ref>And male -- from his name -- but let's ignore that</ref>
Theoretically, the dividing line between strong and weak inductive arguments is at 50%: at anything above 50%, the argument is strong. This can be a bit counterintuitive:
| |||