Jump to content

Which Me?: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (clean up)
No edit summary
Line 68:
** It also leads to some rather bizarre court cases since there are some legal issues where the gate clones are not always considered separate individuals. In one case a person was executed for Manual Operation under the Influence and when his gate clone turns up the judge rules that since he was charged with two counts of MOUI and the clone was created after the commission of the crime it is perfectly legal for them to apply the second death penalty to the gate clone.
*** In another situation a gate clone attempts to murder the original version of himself but instead gets killed by the original acting in self defense. The final police verdict ends up being attempted suicide. Since the clone and the original are legally the same person one murdering the other is technically suicide however since the murder attempt failed the final crime is attempted suicide.
** And sometimes [http://www.schlockmercenary.com/2011-11-27 it was him him].
** Recently the Gavs found a way to differentiate themselves from one another, to the point where they are barely recognizable as Gav-clones, especially the females.
* Pretty thoroughly averted in ''[[The Inexplicable Adventures of Bob]].'' Golly and Jolly are both ''biological'' clones of Molly with totally different upbringings, and the castmembers are apparently all bright enough to realize that even if the three look alike, they are different people.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.