Display title | Supernatural (TV series)/Headscratchers |
Default sort key | Supernatural (TV series)/Headscratchers |
Page length (in bytes) | 240,071 |
Namespace ID | 0 |
Page ID | 4103 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | prefix>Import Bot |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 15:51, 30 November 2021 |
Total number of edits | 10 |
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Magic word (1) | |
Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "John Winchester was supposedly a great hunter. How, exactly? He had falling outs with just about everyone, he never told his sons anything unless they begged, he got Ellen's husband killed... the guy was a failure."
How the hell does a person understand "good hunter" as "good at social interaction"? Anyone should be able to tell that the worth of a hunter is measured by their ability to track and kill monsters. This is just one example of the Complaining About Characters You Don't Like that tends to plague Supernatural trope examples. So I'm asking, is this just evidence of how unreasonable the fanbase is, or is it mostly the fault of one bad editor? |