Topic on User talk:Robkelk
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by DocColress in the topic "The recent deletion" on User talk:Robkelk.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
All anyone needed to do was cover those rules to me the first time I ever broke them. My deleting of comments went on for a while, so if it took this long for anyone to speak up, we quite frankly all deserve two weak suspensions for having done our jobs poorly. |
All anyone needed to do was cover those rules to me the first time I ever broke them. My deleting of comments went on for a while, so if it took this long for anyone to speak up, we quite frankly all deserve two weak suspensions for having done our jobs poorly. |
||
I do understand why you're doing this, but I don't agree with boosting my sentence from one week (which I'd thought was agreed upon) to two weeks because you all completely misinterpreted and are misrepresenting my reasons for deleting a double of a topic in one Talk page. The hidden comment that was there was not the reason I removed it - it wasn't about "deleting evidence" or that sort of thing. If anything, my mistake is that I gave that no thought at all, but that needn't warrant two whole weeks of having my admin rights taken from me. I care about this wiki as much as you do, so please just stop seeing me as your enemy |
I do understand why you're doing this, but I don't agree with boosting my sentence from one week (which I'd thought was agreed upon) to two weeks because you all completely misinterpreted and are misrepresenting my reasons for deleting a double of a topic in one Talk page. The hidden comment that was there was not the reason I removed it - it wasn't about "deleting evidence" or that sort of thing. If anything, my mistake is that I gave that no thought at all, but that needn't warrant two whole weeks of having my admin rights taken from me. I care about this wiki as much as you guys do, so please just stop seeing me as your enemy? :( |