User talk:WalrusGuy

(cur prev topic) 18:24, 10 October 2019 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) edited a post on "Thanks for the contribution, however" . . +14‎
(cur prev topic) 18:23, 10 October 2019 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) commented on "Thanks for the contribution, however" (If they postdate the fork, then it's not okay, and they should be removed. There are only a few of us admins, and despite our best effort...) . . +496‎
(cur prev topic) 16:57, 10 October 2019 . . WalrusGuy (talk | contribs) commented on "Thanks for the contribution, however" (So why is it okay for those entries to be listed on the Western Animation page? Looking at the page's edit history, they've been there a...) . . +147‎
(cur prev topic) 16:31, 10 October 2019 . . Looney Toons (talk | contribs) commented on "Thanks for the contribution, however" (It looks to me like a sentence-by-sentence rewrite, which we ruled (in another case a few months ago) was still too close to TVT's origin...) . . +402‎
(cur prev topic) 16:29, 10 October 2019 . . WalrusGuy (talk | contribs) commented on "Thanks for the contribution, however" (That's mainly because most of those characters were listed on the Western Animation page before getting moved, but some of the entries we...) . . +3,261‎
(cur prev topic) 15:57, 10 October 2019 . . Derivative (talk | contribs) commented on "Thanks for the contribution, however" (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Monster/MaxSteel It looks too similar, however I tagged in other admins for second opinions, so th...) . . +172‎
(cur prev topic) 15:37, 10 October 2019 . . WalrusGuy (talk | contribs) commented on "Thanks for the contribution, however" (I actually copied it from wiki (check the wiki version of All The Tropes), and I didn't even know Max Steel had a page on TV Tropes. And...) . . +377‎
(cur prev topic) 14:34, 10 October 2019 . . Derivative (talk | contribs) commented on "Thanks for the contribution, however" (We are not allowed to take TVT pages post-2012 as our own, which the CM/Max Steele page is from. That would be a violation of copyright l...) . . +768‎