Information for "Archer/Analysis/Season 9"

Basic information

Display titleArcher/Analysis/Season 9
Default sort keyArcher/Analysis/Season 9
Page length (in bytes)9,124
Namespace ID0
Page ID454098
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
DeleteAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorHighComs (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation16:07, 20 July 2018
Latest editorRobkelk (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit20:49, 5 February 2022
Total number of edits6
Recent number of edits (within past 180 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Transcluded templates (16)

Templates used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
This page can be used to compare and contrast the characters and the trope makeup between 'classic Archer' and the dream season that is Danger Island, as well as to contrast the genre-shifting that has taken place across the seasons. It also looks at the some of the narrative tropes that are introduced as a result of serialising the previously episodic show. By limiting the scope of analysis of the season to a limited set of tropes (hence quantitative analysis) taken only from the Tropes Of Legend it is possible to gain insight into the structure of Danger Island at the micro as well as the macro level. For instance, it becomes obvious that the characters which feel (qualitatively) the least substantial correspondingly have the least tropes associated with them. In contrast, characters which feel the most well-developed have the most tropes associated with them. (To that end, Archer, Pam and Fuchs are clearly the most developed, followed by Crackers and Charlotte with Malory, Lanaluakalani and Ray at the bottom.) This quantitative analysis conforms with the intuition that the best characters are those which are more well-developed by laying bare the tropes from which they are composed, thus providing as close to an objective assessment of subjective factors as possible.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO