| Display title | Banned in China |
| Default sort key | Banned in China |
| Page length (in bytes) | 138,338 |
| Namespace ID | 0 |
| Page ID | 170936 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Number of subpages of this page | 2 (0 redirects; 2 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Delete | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | m>Import Bot |
| Date of page creation | 21:27, 1 November 2013 |
| Latest editor | Looney Toons (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 13:33, 18 April 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 143 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 180 days) | 3 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 3 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Banned media is a curious thing - it's easy to associate the banning of works, be it temporary or otherwise, with overzealous Moral Guardians and the like, but beyond the surface spectacle of public outcries from and against seemingly comical purse-clutchers, there lies a fascinating fabric of what fuels such frantic and flustered fussing. Disagreement is inevitable even in the most "free" of societies, and the freedom to exchange ideas inevitably means subjecting them to scrutiny. Such has been true from the onset of human history - and for every literary trailblazing tour de force meaningfully challenging the status quo and breaking the mold, there have been works who were simply caught in the crossfire of an imagined crusade. Further still, a work that might possess little quality or merits might only be known because of the sensibilities that it offended, justifiably or otherwise. |