Contested Sequel: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Looney Toons (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 1747029 by 50.107.187.20 (talk) Deletion of long-standing example with no explanation why it actually isn't an example) Tag: Undo |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Sometimes, the company will try to fix things with the next in the series, only to make more friends and more enemies. Possible result of an [[Unpleasable Fanbase]]. |
Sometimes, the company will try to fix things with the next in the series, only to make more friends and more enemies. Possible result of an [[Unpleasable Fanbase]]. |
||
Note, this is '''not for sequels where people overwhelmingly agree''' that [[Sequelitis|the sequel is bad]]. It's for sequels where [[Broken Base|many fans think it's bad and others think it's good]], usually for different reasons. |
Note, this is '''not for sequels where people overwhelmingly agree''' that [[Sequelitis|the sequel is bad]]. Also, it's '''not''' for [[Fanon Discontinuity|sequels which people disregard as part of the series]]. It's for sequels where [[Broken Base|many fans think it's bad and others think it's good]], usually for different reasons. That makes this a [[YMMV Trope]], so expect to see examples that you disagree with on this page. |
||
See also [[First Installment Wins]], [[Critical Backlash]]. |
See also [[First Installment Wins]], [[Critical Backlash]]. |
||